My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
ECONOMIC VITALITY
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
101719
>
04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2019 12:18:23 PM
Creation date
10/11/2019 4:24:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/17/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
*Note: The bid amount is the amount the City would actually pay for the goods or <br />services; but for determining lowest bidder, the local preference percentage deduction <br />would be used. <br />As previously discussed, policy interests behind a local business preference include <br />improved local economic vitality, as well as keeping a portion of sales tax within the <br />local economy. Potential drawbacks might include fewer businesses submitting bids, <br />and increased costs to the City due to bidding advantage for local businesses that <br />actually charge higher prices. <br />ACTION <br />The EVC can make policy recommendations to the City Council for an amendment to <br />the Pleasanton Municipal Code to implement a Local Business Support Program that: <br />A. In the event of a tie bid from companies with equivalent qualifications and <br />cost, provides a preference for the bidder that is physically located in <br />Pleasanton that has a current City business license. <br />B. Provides a bidding advantage for Pleasanton -based businesses <br />1. What percentage bidding advantage <br />2. Will there be a limit on the maximum dollar advantage <br />If the committee recommends only a local preference in the event of a tie bid, Section <br />3.28.020(C)3. is proposed to be added, as shown in the attachment. <br />If the committee recommends both: (A) local preference in the event of tie bid; and (B) <br />bidding advantage for local business, language is proposed in the text box in Section <br />3.28.020.(C)3. of the attachment, using a 2.5% bidding preference to a maximum of <br />$3,000.1 The committee is of course able to recommend a different bidding preference <br />percentage and maximum. <br />If amendments are recommended for the Pleasanton Municipal Code, when this item is <br />presented to the City Council, the same Local Business Support Program provisions <br />would be also recommended for addition to the existing Administrative Policy: <br />Purchasing Procedures and Manual. <br />Under these criteria, a Pleasanton -based company with a $110,000 bid would be awarded a <br />contract over a Manteca -based company with a $107,500 bid, as with the 2.5% local <br />preference, the Pleasanton -based company's bid for comparison purposes would be $107,250; <br />with the local preference bidding deduction of $2,750 (less than the $3.000 cap). <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.