Laserfiche WebLink
Ordinance No. 2199 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 1. Whether the proposed development plan is in the best interest of the public <br /> health, safety, and general welfare. <br /> The City Council finds that the proposed project, as conditioned, meets all applicable <br /> City standards concerning public health, safety, and welfare. The subject development <br /> would include the installation of all required on-site utilities with connections to municipal <br /> systems in order to serve the new lots. The proposed development is compatible with <br /> the adjacent uses and would be consistent with the existing scale and character of the <br /> area. Adequate setbacks would be provided between the new dwellings and the existing <br /> structures on the adjacent properties. The project will not generate volumes of traffic that <br /> cannot be accommodated by existing City streets and intersections in the area. The <br /> proposed homes will be designed to meet the requirements of the California Building <br /> Code, California Fire Code, and other applicable codes. As such, the Council concludes <br /> this finding can be made. <br /> 2. Whether the proposed development plan is consistent with the Pleasanton <br /> General Plan and any applicable specific plan. <br /> The proposed development includes the demolition an existing single-family home and <br /> construction of three new single-family homes and related improvements on an <br /> approximately 14,400-square-foot lot. The City Council finds the proposed density of <br /> nine dwelling units per acre conforms to the General Plan High Density Residential land <br /> use designation which allows residential densities of over eight dwelling units per acre. <br /> The proposed project promotes General Plan Programs and Policies encouraging new <br /> housing to be developed on infill sites. <br /> In addition to the General Plan, the proposed project is consistent with the High Density <br /> Residential land use designation and intent of the Downtown Specific plan (DSP). There <br /> are no development standards in the DSP for the subject lot, but the DSP includes <br /> policies and programs that the subject lot should follow. The proposal is consistent with <br /> the policies and programs and creates setbacks, density, landscaping, and character of <br /> the subject lot consistent with the surrounding residential neighborhood. <br /> The DSP and Downtown Design Guidelines recommend the use of traditional materials, <br /> finishes, colors, and detailing as well as policies regarding specific allowable <br /> architectural styles within the Downtown. The architectural style and design of the <br /> homes meets the intent of the DSP and guidelines and would not conflict with the <br /> neighborhood. As such, the Council concludes that this finding can be made. <br /> 3. Whether the proposed development plan is compatible with the previously <br /> developed properties in the vicinity and the natural, topographic features of the <br /> site. <br /> The neighborhood includes a mixture of one-and-two-story residences with a variety of <br /> architectural styles. The City Council finds that the proposed lots and two-story <br /> residences are compatible with the land use pattern in the neighborhood and previously <br /> developed properties in the vicinity. The subject lot sits approximately five feet lower <br /> than the grade of the public sidewalk and street but is generally flat once on-site. The <br /> homes have been sited to minimize impacts on surrounding neighbors to the extent <br /> feasible and have been designed to reduce their mass and not overpower the site. The <br /> proposed project has been designed around a very large Valley Oak tree to the rear of <br /> the property which will be retained as part of the application proposal. As such, the City <br /> Council finds the development is sensitive to the existing vegetation on-site. Outdoor <br />