Laserfiche WebLink
30-40)? Although traffic volumes may not be higher than commercial use, reducing <br />vibrant retail space in core downtown seems contrary to DSP goals on increasing <br />vibrancy. Adding two to three dozen homes could also likely create overflow parking <br />issues on our city streets. <br />The second part of her memo reflects that if those changes are implemented, which she <br />believes are different assumptions, she would request the EIR include the following items be <br />addressed for each of those areas to help the Commission understand the impact of the <br />zoning changes: <br />A. "Additional residential units (and number of bedrooms) versus today and versus <br />draft EIR <br />B. Additional buildable square footage versus today and versus draft FIR <br />C. Additional traffic versus today and versus draft EIR with added incremental units <br />D. Additional parking required versus today and versus draft EIR <br />E. Any new potential environmental impacts that need to be studied (e.g., creek near <br />Barone's) <br />F. What is potential loss of existing retail square footage (to residential), excluding the <br />town square? This is not an EIR issue but it is a business issue." <br />She continued as follows: "On Item A, I would request we see the detail of the number of and <br />what the driver of the incremental housing units will be at the unit level and bedroom level for <br />our key strategy changes. This will help decision makers understand the impact of various <br />choices. For example, how many units/bedrooms will come from: <br />New civic center <br />Map A rezones <br />Map B rezones <br />Allowing ground floor housing behind commercial where it was not previously <br />allowed <br />Increasing FAR and building height beyond what is currently allowed." <br />Chair Allen said that she recognized some of this might not be purely related to the EIR but <br />this information is necessary for the Planning Commission, City Council and the community <br />to understand to be able to come to a consensus. Her last comment was a question that was <br />posed by a resident at the February 27 DSP meeting in regard to a concern that the DSP <br />Task Force has a low turnout of residents in attendance at the meetings. She said there was <br />one resident this evening and possibly two or three residents at the end of the EIR, which <br />might be a result of some recommendations that were made which were somewhat <br />inconsistent with the early feedback received from surveys completed by residents and the <br />limited attendance from previous meetings. She expressed concern that residents will be <br />caught off-guard by the end of the process. She posed a question to staff as to whether a <br />workshop could be held for residents living in the downtown area, so they can be informed on <br />some of the major changes being proposed and their implications. <br />Commissioner Brown commented that since Chair Allen's comments are now included as <br />public record, he requested a copy of the letter she referenced. <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 14 of 18 March 13, 2019March13, 2019 5 p.m.Planning Commission <br />Minutes Page 11 of 18 March 13, 2019 tes to State <br />law and the Municipal Code in regard to compliance, in order to make <br />any recommendations considered <br />fair and just.Commissioner Brown continued by saying when he reads the State code, <br />the degrees of freedom relate to space, concentration, traffic, parking and noise control. He did <br />not hear much Planning Commission Minutes Page 10 of 18 <br />March <br />13, 2019 hould be something of more importance.Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 18 <br />March 13, 2019 m a head start.Their two-year-old tested highly in <br />both English and Spanish when they began kindergarten which was <br />a huge benefit.Planning Commission <br />Minutes Page 6 of 18 March 13, 2019