My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2019-16
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
PC-2019-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2019 12:59:57 PM
Creation date
9/26/2019 11:37:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/26/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
PC-2019-16
NOTES
DSP_CERTIFY FEIR FOR DSP UPDATE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Beaudin explained that someone in the neighborhood put out a traffic counter. Staff tried to <br />determine who it belonged to and then received a call regarding the meter, but didn't obtain <br />anyone's name, however, the counter was removed. He noted it was not a City traffic counter. <br />Mr. Tassano said staff likes to know who puts counters out because they receive calls about <br />installing stop signs and it makes it easier when staff knows someone set out a traffic counter; <br />however, it is illegal to place a counter in the roadway without permission. <br />Mr. Beaudin stated the City requires an encroachment permit and there's a process to follow. <br />When the individual called and inquired if the traffic counter was a problem, they were advised <br />of the encroachment permit process, after which time, the equipment was soon removed. <br />Chair Allen referred to the issue previously raised about the worst-case potential that the traffic <br />analysis done regarding the number of trips on the street has possibly doubled. She <br />commented if a vehicle enters one way, backs out from the driveway, and exits the same <br />direction they entered, as opposed to exiting the opposite end of the street, if in this situation <br />the traffic estimates were doubled and whether that would change any recommendations. <br />Mr. Tassano responded that was not the case and that the roadways are built to handle a lot of <br />traffic each day. From his perspective, looking at 100+ vehicles on one street per day does not <br />seem like much, but he nonetheless recognized that the residents living on that street may feel <br />it to be significant. From his perspective, staff would want to look at access if the traffic <br />increased three to four times that amount. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired whether there was a way to make a note within the <br />conditions to request the daycare operator to inform parents of a better route to access the <br />daycare to help increase their awareness of other options. <br />Mr. Beaudin responded in favor of this, saying staff can add a condition that encourages <br />parents to use best and most efficient traffic flow during pickup and drop-off. <br />Commissioner Ritter said he's under the assumption the lease states that it's permissible to <br />operate the daycare out of the home, and he inquired if the space inside the home was <br />designed similarly to the other 17 large daycares. <br />Mr. Beaudin noted the State is responsible for mandating this and it's set forth through their <br />inspection process. <br />Commissioner Brown thanked the speakers for their comments. He said the Planning <br />Commission's role is to check compliance of staff's recommendations around the Municipal <br />Code and to ensure the recommendation given to the Council confirms the application is in <br />compliance with State law and that residents are not doing anything to put the City in legal <br />jeopardy. He said he understands the neighbors' concerns; however, the Commission's role is <br />specific and meant to look at the application, as it stands, and as it relates to State law and the <br />Municipal Code in regard to compliance, in order to make any recommendations considered <br />fair and just. <br />Commissioner Brown continued by saying when he reads the State code, the degrees of <br />freedom relate to space, concentration, traffic, parking and noise control. He did not hear much <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 10 of 18 March 13, 2019 <br />hould <br />be something of more importance.Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 18 March 13, 2019 <br />m a head start.Their two-year-old tested highly in both English and <br />Spanish when they began kindergarten which was a huge benefit. <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 <br />of 18 March 13, 2019
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.