Laserfiche WebLink
How do Decisions of DSP Task Force (2/27/19) Compare to Goals* <br />Goals of task <br />force/ <br /> <br />2/27 Decisions <br />Benefits <br />existing <br />residents <br />Increases retail <br />footprint of <br />existing <br />commercial <br />Increases <br />retail <br />vibrancy <br />Retain unique <br />character; have <br />buffer between <br />uses <br />Process <br />Strong public <br />input; <br />transparent <br />Process <br />Implications <br />shared/well <br />understood <br />Notes <br /> <br />Allow ground floor <br />res behind 50’ <br />commercial or less <br />N N N N N N <br /> <br />True Value store is 175” deep. <br />-Allows storefront retail to be cut <br />by 2/3rd with res. behind. <br />Reduces retail footprint/sales tax, <br />increases res parking on street and <br />no transition buffer for residents. <br /> <br />Increase FAR to <br />300% in <br />commercial area <br />N N N N N N -Risks 3 story dense buildings all <br />over commercial district. And <br />likely with mostly residential as <br />that is where developer profits. <br />-No discussion of implications at <br />2/27 DSP meeting. <br />Building height <br />increased to 46 <br />feet <br />N N N N N N -Buildings 10-15 feet taller than <br />Spring Street <br />-Residential could be ~ 66% to 75% <br />of existing commercial district. <br />Rezone Barone’s in <br />advance of a PUD <br />to allow res. and <br />more <br />N N N N N Postcard/agenda <br />never mentioned <br />Barone’s. <br />No detailed staff <br />report or workshop <br />N (see Planning <br />Commission minutes <br />from 3/13) <br />-Why isn’t zoning upgrade part of <br />normal PUD process? <br />-Inconsistent with public input <br /> <br />Active ground floor Y Y Y Y Y Y Very good start. <br />Code: X = no: Y =yes <br />*This table focuses on existing commercial footprint as that is all that is a given. Town square speculative.