My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
100119
>
20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2019 9:23:54 AM
Creation date
9/24/2019 3:47:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/1/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
20 ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\100119
20 ATTACHMENT 3 - PLANS
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\100119
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cheryl Dickinson spoke on behalf of her son and granddaughter who live in the residence <br />behind the property line and said she believes the plans look over -congested. The height of <br />the proposed houses will block sunlight to her son's home. <br />Scott Self said he and his wife are speaking on behalf of his parents who are residents in the <br />house to the east and they did not believe the comments from the workshop had been <br />addressed, such as the size of initial vegetation and amount of landscaping, privacy from <br />windows, removal of the heritage tree, and the height of the house. <br />Mike St. Pierre spoke about Stanley Boulevard and the existing homes that currently exist with <br />15 -foot setbacks, architectural walls with nice signage for country roads, and he said there <br />used to be a lot of curb appeal to these homes. In comparison to the current developments, <br />there are now five-foot setbacks which are not attractive, and he thinks the City should limit <br />applicants to smaller development and stop forcing as many homes in one footprint. <br />Joshua Dickinson spoke as the homeowner who lives adjacent to the project location. He <br />bought his home two years ago for its privacy and feels this project towers over his home and <br />will diminish its value. He implored the Commissioners to visit the site prior to making a <br />decision. He understands the need for growth; however, what is being constructed or designed <br />is not what has been presented in the renderings. <br />Orcun Polatsoy said he lives on Rachael Place and moved from San Jose one year ago to live <br />within a historic neighborhood in Pleasanton. He did extensive research on the surrounding <br />sites, including the project location, prior to purchasing his home. He expressed that he does <br />not understand the reason to destroy the existing home to construct a new home which will not <br />allow the neighborhood to remain historic. <br />Sarah Gwerder stated she lives to the right of the backyard of the proposed project and <br />expressed concern over the trees on the property, which she was concerned would be <br />removed. She measured her fence line to the neighboring property, and it measured five feet, <br />nine inches which she feels is very close. <br />Lisa Yuan stated she moved to Rachael Place across from the proposed property 15 years <br />ago from Foster City and has enjoyed her quiet neighborhood. She has invited friends to <br />Pleasanton who had difficulty finding parking downtown and she asked if the Commission has <br />considered how much impact the proposed project will have on street parking. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br />Commissioner Pace inquired about the setbacks and the development standards. <br />Ms. Hagen replied that the DSP does not have set development standards. As a PUD, <br />development standards are established on a case-by-case basis, through project review. Staff <br />provided a chart of other properties with similar densities within the DSP that have been <br />approved in this area. As proposed, the project would have a 10 -foot rear setback from the <br />garage and the habitable space on top of the garage will be required to be set back 15 feet. <br />There is a five-foot separation between the side yard setback, which is consistent with <br />adjacent neighbors, with the exception of the homes on Rachael Place, which are set back a <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 16 August 28, 2019 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.