05 Attachment 2 - Laserfiche WebLink

4. The requested funds achieve an impact on the need. 5. The requested amount is commensurate with the expected accomplishment(s). 6. The cost per beneficiary is reasonable. 7. The activity/service is cost-effective. 8. The effectiveness of the activity/service can be measured using well-defined performance measures that are clearly stated in the application. E) ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCES 1. The agency has been successful in obtaining supplemental on-going funding from other sources for its activities/services. 2. When appropriate, the agency charges a fee and/or produces other income that may be used to support this activity/service. 3. The agency contributes to this activity/service. 4. There is evidence that the agency is receiving private and/or community financial support.. F) NECESSITY OF CITY FUNDING 1. City funds are critical to carrying out this activity/service. 2. This activity/service is appropriate for City funding. 3. The activity/service reduces demands on other City resources. 4. There are no alternative funding sources. 5. There are no alternatives available that are less expensive. G) CONSISTENCY WITH CITY HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT POLICIES 1. HUD [Alameda County HOME Consortium] Consolidated Plan 2. General Plan Housing Element 3. Tri -Valley Human Services Needs Assessment (2011) and Strategic Plan (2014-16) H) HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION PRIORITIES 1. The project prioritizes the "core services" identified in the adopted "2011 Human Services_ Needs Assessment" (dental care, primary health care, mental health, food/nutrition, housing activities). 2. The project takes into consideration. transportation (e.g., incorporates or anticipates how clients will access the proposed programs or activities). 3. The project is innovative and demonstrates service coordination and collaboration. 4. The. agency has registered with Alameda County 2-1-1 and Ptownlife.org.