4_Exhibit A - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-2019-21 Page Two Section 1: Initial Study and Negative Declaration 1. Recommends that the City Council adopt the IS/ND prepared for the Project. Section 2: Findings for PUD-134 With respect to the Planned Unit Development application, PUD-134, the Planning Commission makes the following findings and determinations with respect to each of the considerations for approval of a PUD Development Plan as required by Section 18.68.110 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC): 1. Whether the plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general welfare: Planning Commission finds that the Project is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general welfare for the following reasons: • The Project would expand commercial uses within an existing commercial district in the City, allowing for more effective utilization of an already-developed property. • The site is adequately buffered from surrounding residential uses by major roadways or existing commercial uses. • The Project is compatible with the adjacent uses and would be consistent with the existing scale and character of the area. • Adequate setbacks would be provided between the new structures and the existing structures on the adjacent properties. • The Project would eliminate the existing internal drive aisle connecting the Project site to the church property located to the immediate south and install a loading space/zone for deliveries, which adequately addresses the church's trespassing concern. • According to correspondence from the Pleasanton Police Department, and a review of service call data for similar uses in the City, the proposed Project would not be expected to generate substantial increased demand for police service. • Because the Project would combine uses on the site (gas, carwash, and convenience store), and is located in close proximity to other commercial uses, it would maximize the potential for pass-by trips, which is a means of reducing vehicle miles traveled. • As indicated in the Initial Study/Negative Declaration, all potential environmental impacts associated with the Project would be less than significant. • Because the proposed uses would be conditionally permitted, the City could impose additional conditions on these uses if unexpected problems were to materialize in the future. Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton, based on the entire record of proceedings, including the oral and written agenda reports and all public comment and testimony: ts at 2786 Calle Alegre, emailed staff of their support of the proposed project. Any public comments received after publication of this PUD-134/P18-0332/P18-0334 Planning Commission Page 23 of 24 staff and the Planning Commission at the work session: convenience store patrons loitering and leaving trash in the church parking lot, convenience store delivery trucks and customers using the church's property for unloading and parking, and convenience store patrons speeding through the church parking lot from the convenience store. PUD-134/P18-0332/P18-0334 Planning Commission Page 22 of 24 considered a sensitive receptor, but due to concerns raised by the church, the report conservatively analyzes impacts to workers and visitors to the church. PUD-134/P18-0332/P18-0334 Planning Commission Page 21 of 24 dent. PUD-134/P18-0332/P18-0334 Planning Commission Page 16 of 24