My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
4
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
08-28
>
4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2019 4:29:33 PM
Creation date
8/21/2019 3:35:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/28/2019
Document Relationships
4_Exhibit A
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\08-28
4_Exhibit B - Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\08-28
4_Exhibit C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\08-28
4_Exhibit D - Draft Initial Study & Neg Dec
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\08-28
4_Exhibits E-G
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\08-28
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
report will be forwarded to the Commission. As discussed above, the Church in Pleasanton <br /> had previously provided comments as a result of the work session public hearing notice. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> A draft Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/ND) (Exhibit D) has been prepared for the <br /> proposed project. The draft IS/ND is in circulation for public comments between <br /> August 5, 2019 and August 26, 2019. To date, staff has not received any comments on the <br /> draft IS/ND. Based on the draft IS, staff believes that the project would not have any significant <br /> environmental impacts. Staff, therefore, believes that the Initial Study/Negative Declaration can <br /> be issued in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If the <br /> Planning Commission concurs with this environmental assessment, it must make the finding <br /> that the IS/ND adequately evaluates the potential environmental impacts of the project prior to <br /> taking action on the project. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> As proposed by the applicant and conditioned by staff, staff believes that the uses will be <br /> compatible with the surrounding businesses and will not detrimentally affect the surrounding <br /> uses or properties. Conditions of approval have been included which will ensure that the safety <br /> and general welfare of the surrounding area, and the City in general, is maintained. <br /> Staff believes that the project's building and site design, as proposed and conditioned, is <br /> appropriate for the surrounding area, conforms to the purposes of the PUD Ordinance, and <br /> merit a favorable recommendation by the Commission. <br /> Staff Planner: Jenny Soo, 925.931.5615/jsoocityofpleasantonca.gov <br /> Reviewed/Approved By: <br /> Steve Otto, Senior Planner <br /> Ellen Clark, Planning Manager <br /> Julie Harryman, Assistant City Attorney <br /> Brian Dolan, Acting Community Development Director/Assistant City Manager <br /> PUD-134/P18-0332/P18-0334 Planning Commission <br /> Page 24 of 24 <br />d incrementally increase traffic, <br /> noise, and activity at the site. <br /> No changes to the operation of the Some of the existing trees would be <br /> convenience store and fuel station. removed to accommodate the project. <br /> New buildings and landscaping would <br /> enhance the visual quality of the site and <br /> streetscape. <br /> Elimination of the drive aisle between 7- <br /> Eleven and the church property to the south <br /> addresses the church's concerns with the <br /> current operation of 7-Eleven. <br /> PUBLIC NOTICE <br /> Notices for this hearing were sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a <br /> 1,000-foot radius of the site. Staff has provided the location and noticing maps as Exhibit H for <br /> reference. The public notice was also published in The Valley Times. At the time this report <br /> was published, Tracey and James Montoya, residents at 2786 Calle Alegre, emailed staff of <br /> their support of the proposed project. Any public comments received after publication of this <br /> PUD-134/P18-0332/P18-0334 Planning Commission <br /> Page 23 of 24 <br />staff and the Planning Commission at the work <br /> session: convenience store patrons loitering and leaving trash in the church parking lot, <br /> convenience store delivery trucks and customers using the church's property for unloading and <br /> parking, and convenience store patrons speeding through the church parking lot from the <br /> convenience store. <br /> PUD-134/P18-0332/P18-0334 Planning Commission <br /> Page 22 of 24 <br />considered a sensitive receptor, but due to concerns <br /> raised by the church, the report conservatively analyzes impacts to workers and visitors to the <br /> church. <br /> PUD-134/P18-0332/P18-0334 Planning Commission <br /> Page 21 of 24 <br />dent. <br /> PUD-134/P18-0332/P18-0334 Planning Commission <br /> Page 16 of 24 <br />