My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062619
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
PC 062619
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2019 6:08:56 PM
Creation date
8/15/2019 6:08:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/26/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
doors facing streets, and he was not keen on wrapping around on Peters Avenue of <br /> commercial and having impractical residential behind. <br /> Chair Allen said her read of some comments from staff and the City Council was that the <br /> streets including the east side of Peters Avenue are in the defined area and residential is not <br /> on the street front. She stated Mr. Beaudin had answered that twice when asked by <br /> Councilmembers Narum and Brown if there could be a residence in front. The answer was <br /> "no;" commercial has to be in front and the residence is in back. <br /> Mr. Beaudin confirmed this is correct. <br /> Commissioner Brown said in talking about Salt Craft with houses behind, those houses behind <br /> are oriented towards the street which is in line with the design guidelines that say you want a <br /> front door facing the street. He is saying that should not be prohibited on Peters Avenue to <br /> have housing "in behind" but facing the street and maintaining a commercial presence <br /> because they are trying to maintain vitality. But, he would not want to see that on Main Street, <br /> someone putting residential in the front and commercial behind. <br /> Chair Allen said it sounds as if they are in agreement with Main Street that residential has to <br /> be behind and they are not in agreement with the transition district and side streets where <br /> there is a corner and whether there can be residential in the front of one of the sides of the <br /> corner. She thinks this is a big question because there are a number of lots on Peters Avenue <br /> that are long. If they say they can have more townhouses like those behind Salt Craft, there <br /> could be a lot of long lots that end up taking up two-thirds of a block that are mainly <br /> townhouses. The east side is zoned transitional and not residential. <br /> Commissioner Brown said the purpose of creating a transitional zoning district is to drive <br /> investment in commercial as well as residential in that area. He did not know it made sense to <br /> force commercial on both streets of a long piece of property as long as they are getting <br /> commercial on one side, which creates the transitional district. <br /> Chair Allen suggested voting on this. She said the residential could still go on the second and <br /> third story in a transitional zone. It could be a use similar to Salt Craft if it was a brand-new <br /> building and it could have residential at the top. <br /> Commissioner Brown said he prefers the City Council recommendation around defining it <br /> according to the three districts. It does not say anything about corner lots. The Task Force did <br /> not vet on this and he did not want to give the City Council advice. <br /> Chair Allen asked if Commissioner Brown wanted to vote on this. <br /> Commissioner Brown said he thinks trying to regulate corner lots is being overly restrictive, <br /> and Commissioner Ritter concurred. <br /> ACTION: Chair Allen took a straw poll which resulted in a vote of 2-1 to not move <br /> forward with including additional regulation for corner lots, with Chair Allen opposed. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 14 of 27 June 26, 2019 <br />cing the <br /> street, because that is in alignment with the Downtown Design Guidelines. They want front <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 13 of 27 June 26, 2019 <br />ties side <br /> by side could have very different requirements. He also asked that outdoor seating be a <br /> Zoning Administrator (ZA) decision and not a Planning Commission decision. Lastly, requiring <br /> commercial to wrap around the corner seems like overkill where this is an issue that can be <br /> resolved by the ZA. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 27 June 26, 2019 <br />ne 26, 2019 <br />