Laserfiche WebLink
Noise <br /> The PMC states that a proposed conditional use must be in accordance with the objectives of <br /> the Zoning Ordinance. One of those objectives is to "promote the stability of existing land uses <br /> that conform with the General Plan and to protect them from inharmonious influences and <br /> harmful intrusions." To help minimize noise impacts on adjacent tenants, the applicant is <br /> proposing to modify Lanes 1, 2, 3, and 7 by adding an additional interior wall with <br /> sound-attenuating insulation set in from the existing wall between the two tenant spaces. In <br /> addition, all activities would be held indoors. Furthermore, the subject building does not contain <br /> any operable windows, which will further reduce noise impacts on the surrounding area. To <br /> further minimize any potential noise impacts, staff is recommending the following conditions of <br /> approval: <br /> • The applicant shall keep all exterior doors of the building closed when not being used <br /> for ingress/egress purposes; <br /> • The applicant shall inform all patrons to not loiter outside of the building and to be <br /> courteous and quiet when entering or leaving the parking area; and <br /> • If the operation of this use results in conflicts pertaining to parking, noise, <br /> traffic/circulation, or other factors, at the discretion of the Director of Community <br /> Development, this conditional use permit may be submitted to the Planning Commission <br /> for their subsequent review at a public hearing. If necessary, the Planning Commission <br /> may modify or add conditions of approval to mitigate such impacts, or may revoke said <br /> conditional use permit. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> As articulated above, staff believes the use, as proposed and conditioned, is consistent with <br /> the objectives of the zoning district. However, alternatives to the proposal that could be <br /> considered by the Planning Commission include: <br /> 1. Denial of the application. Such an action would preclude the applicant from occupying <br /> the subject site and conducting the specified activities; or <br /> 2. Approval of the CUP with modifications. The Planning Commission could approve the <br /> CUP, but with fewer patrons, with modified hours of operation, or other changes to the <br /> proposal. <br /> Since staff is able to support the findings to approve the project, as proposed, and believes the <br /> project will not adversely impact any existing uses or the surrounding area, staff suggests that <br /> neither of the two project alternatives above should be pursued. <br /> SUMMARY OF PROS/CONS OF PROJECT <br /> PROS CONS <br /> Use is consistent with the General Plan and The project would slightly increase parking <br /> zoning designation. demand and traffic on the subject lot, but <br /> traffic/circulation and parking impacts would <br /> not be adverse. <br /> Provides additional recreational <br /> opportunities to support recreational growth <br /> and improvement for organizations, teams, <br /> and adults. <br /> P19-0140, 1809 Santa Rita Road, Suite A and B Planning Commission <br /> 7 of 8 <br />nd that adequate <br /> parking exists on-site to accommodate all existing and proposed uses. However, should <br /> parking problems occur, staff has included a condition of approval which allows the Director of <br /> Community Development to refer the use permit back to the Planning Commission for possible <br /> additional mitigation measures to be applied. <br /> P19-0140, 1809 Santa Rita Road, Suite A and B Planning Commission <br /> 6 of 8 <br />