Laserfiche WebLink
Lighting <br /> The architectural design guidelines specify that all exterior lighting be designed, installed and <br /> controlled to minimize lighting on the hillsides and prevent lights from pointing directly at up-hill <br /> or adjacent properties. Building up-lighting and/or wash lighting on the building is prohibited, <br /> other than low-level lighting for pathways and entryways. In addition, wall-mounted lighting on <br /> the proposed residence should be complementary to the architectural style and consistent with <br /> the architectural design guidelines. <br /> At this time, only wall-mounted down-lighting for the residence is proposed. Staff believes the <br /> proposed wall-mounted lighting is complementary to the intended architectural style of the <br /> proposed residence and is consistent with the architectural design guidelines. <br /> DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA <br /> The Pleasanton Municipal Code Section 18.20 sets forth the criteria to be addressed in <br /> reviewing a Design Review application. These criteria are set forth in the draft Resolution <br /> included as Exhibit A, and includes preservation of natural beauty, relationship of the <br /> residence with the streetscape and surroundings, compatibility of architecture, among other <br /> criteria. Based on the project's conformance with the subdivision architectural guidelines as <br /> outlined above, staff also finds the proposed home would also be consistent with each of the <br /> applicable design review criteria. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> The subject parcel is a legally created lot zoned for residential uses. The proposed residence <br /> complies with the regulations and guidelines of the Estates on Oak Ridge subdivision. <br /> Alternatives include: <br /> 1. Approve the project with a modified house design, height, size, etc.; <br /> While the proposed project complies with the applicable regulations and guidelines for this site, <br /> Alternative 1 could be selected if the Planning Commission does not believe that the proposed <br /> house design, height, size, etc. are appropriate for this site. Alternative 2 is inconsistent with <br /> the purpose of the lot and of the zoning district which both intend and permit the construction <br /> of a single-family residence on this lot. The proposed project represents a reasonable <br /> development scenario for the site and as such, staff does not recommend any of the <br /> alternatives. <br /> P19-0092, 6 Winding Oaks Drive Planning Commission <br /> 8 of 9 <br /> mostly drought tolerant, as well as <br /> hardscape features, including a decorative brick and black basalt gravel driveway and entry <br /> walkway, decorative patio, and decorative stepping pads to complement the brick wainscoting <br /> on the proposed residence. <br /> The architectural design guidelines require a minimum of 22 new 24-inch box size trees on the <br /> subject lot. The proposed landscape plan includes a total of 23 new trees throughout the site, <br /> all 24-inch box size. No existing trees are proposed for removal or will be affected by the <br /> project. <br /> Staff believes the proposed landscape plan will provide adequate landscaping for the site, as <br /> required by the architectural design guidelines. The combination of plant materials and <br /> hardscape will add interest to the site and will also soften the appearance of the home from the <br /> surrounding parcels. <br /> P19-0092, 6 Winding Oaks Drive Planning Commission <br /> 6 of 9 <br />2002 DSP in 2013. They provided it to staff in <br /> 2014 and have been awaiting this process. She said although there have been wins, there <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 27 June 26, 2019 <br />