My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_Minutes_June 26, 2019
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
07-24
>
_Minutes_June 26, 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2019 9:59:55 AM
Creation date
7/17/2019 9:59:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/24/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Downtown Design Guidelines, Downtown Hospitality Guidelines, and Municipal Code <br /> regulations; (3) modifications to land use designations for certain properties within the <br /> specific plan area; and review, consider, and recommend certification of the Final <br /> Environmental Impact Report for the updated plan. <br /> Senior Planner Shweta Bonn presented the specifics of the item in the Agenda Report. <br /> Commissioner Brown referred to Item 3 regarding corner lots and stated this was not <br /> discussed during any of the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) Task Force meetings, and he <br /> asked why this was added. <br /> Mr. Beaudin responded that as the discussion about residential visibility proceeded, the issue <br /> was apparent, and staff was therefore looking to the Planning Commission for policy direction. <br /> The Commission does not have to address this topic in the plan, but staff will want to ensure <br /> these issues are raised through the remainder of the process because it is not clear how <br /> residential visibility is addressed on a corner lot. <br /> Commissioner Ritter inquired how the City addresses visibility in other parts of Pleasanton. <br /> Mr. Beaudin responded that the City currently does not have policies that require a project to <br /> minimize visibility of a use or structure. Staff arrived at the options to address visibility, and <br /> staff is looking for guidance to clarify for applicants and staff as to how to move forward on <br /> these particular locations in the downtown. <br /> Commissioner Ritter inquired as to who came up with the idea of a Planned Unit Development <br /> (PUD) for residential development. <br /> Mr. Beaudin responded that after the DSP Task Force meeting and City Council meeting it was <br /> clear there was a lot of concern in how and where residential is added. The suggested <br /> approach is a way to have direction from the Planning Commission on how to add residential <br /> uses in the downtown and proceed with this process. <br /> Commissioner Brown referenced Mike Carey's email regarding Policy LD.P-49 regarding <br /> existing buildings and landscaping on City property as part of the new residential infill project. <br /> He questioned whether the policy raised was ever brought up during a Task Force meeting. <br /> Ms. Clark responded this particular policy has been part of the plan since the red-lined draft <br /> was reviewed, early on in the Task Force's discussions. Therefore, it has been included in the <br /> draft plan for some time. <br /> Commissioner Brown asked if it was incremental or different than the plan proposed. <br /> Ms. Clark responded that the existing Downtown Specific Plan does not include a similar <br /> policy. <br /> Mr. Beaudin commented that staff is open to discussing and making changes to the currently <br /> proposed policy given this is a public process and there is every intention to keep information <br /> transparent. The Task Force has gone through chapter by chapter with the red-lined versions <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 27 June 26, 2019 <br />floor would be 15 feet, whereas as currently designed, it is set back on <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 7 June 12, 2019 <br />