My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_Minutes_June 26, 2019
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
07-24
>
_Minutes_June 26, 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2019 9:59:55 AM
Creation date
7/17/2019 9:59:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/24/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
never met the test. If they use story poles it should be done in a way where people know what <br /> they expect. <br /> Commissioner Brown said he thinks story poles and visuals should be considered a part of the <br /> PUD process and that standards should be developed, but he suggested this be brought back <br /> at a different time and meeting. <br /> Commissioner Ritter agreed. <br /> ACTION: There was unanimous consensus that a discussion of standards for story <br /> poles and visuals should be brought back ata future meeting. <br /> Ground Floor Residential Uses on Corner Lots: <br /> Commissioner Ritter said he was not in favor of doing anything to add to the existing permitting <br /> process in place which would create more regulation and burden. In the permit process, those <br /> questions are going to be asked and answered. <br /> Commissioner Brown inquired whether Commissioner Ritter was in favor of the February 26 <br /> Task Force recommendation or the April 16 and May 7 City Council direction, or neither. <br /> Commissioner Ritter said he was in favor of the February 26 Task Force recommendation. <br /> Chair Allen said she was in favor of the City Council direction which, as she perceived, it was <br /> that both sides of a lot would be commercial. She referenced the Salt Craft project located at <br /> 377 St. Mary's Street and said if a project like that came forward, instead of having <br /> townhouses the goal would be to have the Peters Avenue side be commercial. Her reasoning <br /> is that if they want to get the side streets activated to be more commercial, they need to be <br /> made commercial. She said a lot of the long, narrower lots are along the east side of Peters <br /> Avenue and one of the goals of the Task Force was to begin to move more commercial and <br /> retail to side streets. If they allow what could be three-quarters of a long lot and have a small <br /> building similar to that where Salt Craft is located, and then the rest be townhouses, this would <br /> move residential and would give up the east side of Peters Avenue as a street that could be <br /> used in the future for commercial. <br /> With that said, if commercial was impractical, she would be open to a PUD on a very, very <br /> narrow lot of 50 feet, but not 75 feet. Also, some of the corner lots are about 65 feet deep and <br /> in researching coffee shops and salons, the average salon is 1,250 square feet for six to eight <br /> people. The average coffee shop is about 1,500 square feet. So, there could easily be a <br /> 50- or 60-foot storefront but just not as deep, similar to Town Hall Books reversed which is <br /> about 30 feet of storefront and 70 feet deep. <br /> Commissioner Ritter said he did not want to rule from the bench. <br /> Chair Allen disagreed and said there is no ground floor residential on a street front, and a <br /> corner has two street fronts. To her, it is really clear if they keep it simple. <br /> Commissioner Ritter said the Task Force had the same simple recommendation too. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 12 of 27 June 26, 2019 <br /><br />ght <br /> such as the renderings on what they eventually would like Main Street to look like. He did not <br /> disagree, as an example, that making PUDs mandatory for all residential projects that fill all of <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 27 June 26, 2019 <br /> Laura Olson, Executive Director of PDA, and member of the Downtown Specific Plan Task <br /> Force, voiced disappointment with what was being presented, stating the PDA Vitality <br /> Committee began meeting and red-lining the 2002 DSP in 2013. They provided it to staff in <br /> 2014 and have been awaiting this process. She said although there have been wins, there <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 27 June 26, 2019 <br />