My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_Minutes_June 26, 2019
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
07-24
>
_Minutes_June 26, 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2019 9:59:55 AM
Creation date
7/17/2019 9:59:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/24/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Brown said he thinks the Planning Commission should also discuss this as it <br /> relates to the MU-T District because the pre-February Task Force meeting recommendation to <br /> feathering heights resulted in having the downtown at 40 feet, then Peters at 36 feet and <br /> residential at 30 feet. He liked this from a visibility perspective. When the City Council opted in <br /> and reasserted it was more in favor of the 36 feet/125 FAR versus the 40 feet/300 FAR, from <br /> his perspective, the main purpose of that was to feather the residential into the commercial and <br /> it was in keeping with the existing character of the downtown. <br /> He recognized arguments around vitality but, at the end of the day they are establishing the <br /> opportunity for Peters Avenue to become a transitional district and what is there is not <br /> 40 feet/300 FAR. If it is changed to 40 feet/300 FAR, he thinks this encourages a different kind <br /> of thought than the 36 feet/125 FAR. <br /> Commissioner Ritter asked about the 36 feet/300 FAR, noting it would be a mix of both to give <br /> some options on the feathering. <br /> Commissioner Brown said he did not think 36 feet/300 FAR made sense in encouraging a <br /> different product. <br /> Chair Allen agreed it did not make sense. It is currently designated as Office which is 30 feet <br /> and well below 100 FAR. It is increasing what the standards are today for the properties along <br /> here that are designated as Office. <br /> Commissioner Brown concurred and said this is an opportunity to enhance the downtown and <br /> be a transitional district between residential and commercial, and to encourage a different type <br /> of product that feathers the two and allows for revitalization of the downtown. He thinks <br /> 36 feet/125 FAR still does that, whereas at 40 feet/300 FAR, they are just extending the <br /> downtown commercial into Peters Avenue and he was not sure he was in agreement with that. <br /> Commissioner Ritter inquired whether there were currently existing buildings above 36-feet in <br /> the Mixed-Use Transitional area. <br /> Mr. Beaudin said the West Angela/Peters Avenue townhouses are 34 feet, 6 inches in height. <br /> The St. Mary's Street project is 36 feet tall. The other two things that fall into this residential <br /> visibility category are the story poles and visual simulations which could be added to <br /> discussion. <br /> Commissioner Brown proposed a motion that the Planning Commission recommend the City <br /> Council's recommendation around just the Mixed Use Transitional being 36 feet/125 maximum <br /> FAR. <br /> Commissioner Ritter seconded, and said he would push against using the word "two-story" and <br /> "three-story" because if they keep to the number of feet, this is what the Task Force discussed. <br /> ACTION: There was unanimous consensus that the Planning Commission support the <br /> City Council's direction for the MU-T District for 36 feet maximum height and 125 <br /> maximum Floor-Area-Ratio. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 10 of 27 June 26, 2019 <br />ght <br /> such as the renderings on what they eventually would like Main Street to look like. He did not <br /> disagree, as an example, that making PUDs mandatory for all residential projects that fill all of <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 27 June 26, 2019 <br /> Laura Olson, Executive Director of PDA, and member of the Downtown Specific Plan Task <br /> Force, voiced disappointment with what was being presented, stating the PDA Vitality <br /> Committee began meeting and red-lining the 2002 DSP in 2013. They provided it to staff in <br /> 2014 and have been awaiting this process. She said although there have been wins, there <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 27 June 26, 2019 <br />