02 - Laserfiche WebLink

38. 3716 Stanley Blvd. Commercial P19-0128 and P19-0129 Public Storage Applications for Design Review and Conditional Use Permit to demolish 7 buildings and construct three new buildings totaling approximately 205,027 -square -feet for Public Storage. • Status Under Review • Next Steps/Details: Staff is reviewing the plans for completeness. • Applicant: Pat Costanzo • Staff Contact(s): Megan Campbell ADVANCED PLANNING 39. Downtown Specific Plan I Specific Plan Update The Downtown Specific Plan was adopted in 2002, and serves as a guide for the future development and preservation of the downtown area, addressing issues such as land use, transportation, parking, historic preservation, design and beautification, and economic vitality. City Council has identified updating the Downtown Specific Plan as a priority, has approved a scope of work and professional services contract, and has confirmed a 10 - member Task Force to guide this process. The Task Force has met regularly since January 2017 to discuss existing conditions, opportunities and constraints, and consider land use and policy options for various parts of the Specific Plan Area, including the current Civic Center site. • Status Under Review • Next Steps/Details: City Council aprovided policy direction at its meetings on April 16 and May 7, 2019. At its final meeting on May 28, the Task Force directed the Draft Plan and related General Plan, Municipal Code and Downtown Design Guidelines Amendments be forwarded to City Council, and reflecting direction provided by the Task Force in February 2019. Next Steps: Planning Commission Public Hearing in late June/July 2019; City Council Hearings August/September 2019. • Applicant: City of Pleasanton • Staff Contact(s): Ellen Clark 40. Johnson Drive Economic I Commercial Development Zone (JDEDZ) The Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone is currently the subject of a lawsuit. The Petitioner in this lawsuit alleges that the air quality analysis contained in the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the JDEDZ was incomplete. The Petitioner also alleges that the economic analysis for the project should have been recirculated for public review. Given the inherent delay associated with litigation involving the California Environmental Quality Act, the City has agreed to set aside the Page 12 of 20