My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 041019
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
PC 041019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2019 2:28:07 PM
Creation date
6/19/2019 2:28:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/10/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
right side of the driveway so the extension would be to the south; the entrance point, after <br /> making a left turn to make the next right turn, would be the same whether it was a 35-foot or <br /> 45-foot driveway. <br /> Chair Allen asked for the capacity of this gas station in comparison to the one previously <br /> approved on Santa Rita Road. <br /> Mr. Tassano stated it is comparable, but he thinks there are extra fueling positions at the Santa <br /> Rita location. From a parking perspective, staff had stricter guidelines for the Santa Rita <br /> location, as well as the gas station on First Street, which has a similar design. Staff was very <br /> strict on the parking requirements for both of these locations and he has observed those over <br /> the last few years. The code requirements for parking do not reflect what is seen in the peak <br /> hours so there is more flexibility in the parking, which is why he would judge the conflicts <br /> entering and exiting. <br /> Chair Allen referred to the driveways for the other projects and confirmed that the Santa Rita <br /> Road/West Las Positas Boulevard location or the southern-most location closest to the retail <br /> development is the narrowest; Mr. Tassano said he believes it is less than 27 feet. The next <br /> driveway is 40 to 42 feet on the corner of Santa Rita Road. This is the one he looked at in <br /> evaluating how this proposed location would work and did not believe the 40-foot driveway <br /> provides anything additional except more flexibility on how quickly a vehicle can come across. <br /> Commissioner Balch said he noticed that the U-turn is further down for the location on West <br /> Las Positas Boulevard, at the end of the car wash, and he would not think there is the same <br /> traffic. <br /> Mr. Tassano confirmed. He then said in addition to the reduction they also requested it be <br /> shifted to the east so there is better sight access upon entering, and it separates the visibility of <br /> how a vehicle exits the car wash. However, 35 feet is adequate at this location for that reason. <br /> Commissioner Brown asked if other cities codify what percentage of the canopy parked cars in <br /> a combined model like this would contribute to parking. <br /> Mr. Tassano said as opposed to what other cities do, staff assesses the IT Parking Manual <br /> and they do not count those in their parking as spots. Over time, people's behavior changes <br /> and the way in which convenience stores are used is different than in the 1990s. These are <br /> fueling positions and they have a separate standard which states how many parking spaces <br /> are needed. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor referred to Ray Street and asked how wide the south driveway was <br /> when exiting. <br /> Mr. Tassano said he was not sure, but the real issue with that location is less about the width. <br /> There was a large vertical displacement so someone would `catch air' if they were going too <br /> fast. It also exits at an odd angle, and they requested this to be widened as well, but he was <br /> not sure of the dimensions. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 15 April 10, 2019 <br />25 percent area, therefore, <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 19 of 22 March 27, 2019 <br /> 22 March 27, 2019 <br />d. <br /> Ms. Amos said those other proposals did not include the Shriner family's property and the <br /> access required constructing a bridge over the creek. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 16 of 22 March 27, 2019 <br />