My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 032719
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
PC 032719
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2019 12:50:54 PM
Creation date
6/19/2019 12:50:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/27/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Beaudin replied they didn't use that type of mapping but rather used the City's adopted <br /> mapping protocol. However, in theory, there would be a larger area to blend an average and <br /> there should be less of those features with a larger minimum `quadrant' or grid system. <br /> Chair Allen acknowledged the research used by the City to set the standard. <br /> Mr. Beaudin stated the goal was to create something that allowed for a true interpretation of <br /> Measure PP and QQ. Staff looked at several jurisdictions' hillside regulations and translated <br /> them into a policy the City could replicate for other development projects and this was the <br /> methodology used. <br /> Commissioner Ritter said he did not remember anomalies for other properties. <br /> Mr. Beaudin clarified that the Spotorno site was in the flats and staff did not apply this <br /> methodology given the hillside components of that project relate to trails and open space <br /> conservation. <br /> Commissioner Ritter asked if removing the foliage would change the mapping. <br /> Mr. Beaudin noted this was one example that could be causing the anomalies. He said staff <br /> has been onsite during the dryer season and depressions were noted in the ground. In some <br /> cases, the outfall will show up from water running in the area. In other cases, there might have <br /> been a tree which fell over and created a divot in the ground, as well as other reasons. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> Applicant Jeff Schroeder with Ponderosa Homes introduced the Ponderosa team and provided <br /> background of their work, stating they initially applied in 2014 and returned with a more formal <br /> submittal in 2015. He explained there was delay due to Measure PP, but they worked with staff <br /> to refine the plan and proceeded to submit the project from the original 39 lot proposal to 33 <br /> lots, which includes the two existing houses. He said the plan meets Measure PP's guidelines <br /> because they stay out of the 25 percent slope areas, except for the tiny anomalies that could <br /> be caused by several factors, such as cows, roads, water, and <br /> man-made structures. Most of this proposal is not visible from anywhere; it is under the <br /> General Plan density midpoint, meets the City's requirements and includes community benefits <br /> of community parks and significant safety improvements on Dublin Canyon Road. <br /> Ponderosa Homes' Planning Manager Rick Rosenbaum gave a PowerPoint presentation and <br /> stated the application has been refined several times to adhere to requirements. He spoke <br /> about their staking of the site and identifying the anomalies, presented an aerial map showing <br /> the development footprint and overlay, existing creek and vegetation, design of the property, <br /> lot sizes, street sections and road improvements. He said they are seeking the Commission's <br /> support to: define land use, apply the standard used for the Lund Ranch project, support the <br /> notion that the isolated pink areas are anomalies and are not protected hillside slope areas, <br /> support the proposed unit count of 33 residential lots and consideration of the proposed trail <br /> connection, location of the staging area, open space and the Lester family's desire to continue <br /> to reside on the property. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 22 March 27, 2019 <br />