PC 032719 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner O'Connor added that even if they were considered separate, Measure QQ does not necessarily give anyone a right to a minimum number of homes, and Commissioner Brown noted this was his point. Question 1 b: Would the Commission interpret Measure PP such that the spot areas displayed on the mapping as having a slope of 25 percent or more should be treated as anomalies and exempt from Measure PP. Commissioner O'Connor said some spots are quite small and he could not tell the difference. Given the spots are being detected and you cannot tell the difference, the rest of the slope must be very close to the 25 percent. However, he still thinks the intent of Measure PP would be the weight of those because they are so small, which is not the case on all of the lots; some of the lots have a much more extensive pinkish color but he believes for the tiny spots, excluding them would be consistent with the intent of Measure PP. Chair Allen clarified that Commissioner O'Connor was saying that some spots would be tiny and should be excluded. She said that at some point in time staff will get into a discussion of what is and is not small; if the spots are larger, they should be of concern. Commissioner Ritter agreed but noted the suggestion to make the area 9x9 instead of 3x3 to see if this causes less anomalies. He still believes that by treating anomalies as exempt, Lot 20 is the only property with the most; the other lots only have one or two anomalies. He said Lot 20 might be the property they review more closely, and they would be more flexible with the other lots. Chair Allen suggested the Commission review the map and she clarified the map was the new Lot 13 map and not the old Lot 20 map. Commissioner Brown said he spent a lot of time looking at Lot 19 last week with a staff member and the applicant. If they drew lines and went back to the larger scale picture, they could easily draw a line starting at Lot 21 through Lot 19 down to Lot 11, where a curve that coincides with the contour lines of the map could be detected. He thought it might be foliage and while he saw a bit of lift in the soil, he had a tough time seeing it. He was most concerned by all of the anomalies together and expressed if it is there, it is minimal. Commissioner Ritter said given the sloping and grading issues of Lots 19 to 21, he assumed a way to address this would be by building stepped retaining walls. Commissioner O'Connor said the different coloring he saw was dependent on the map he was viewing. In looking at the four lots at the bottom near the entrance, three of the four lots appear to be covered with the pink color in one map. Chair Allen noted that the Commission is not talking about those lots in this specific discussion question and suggested going to each separately. Commissioner Brown suggested talking about the new Lots 12, 13, and 4 to Lots 19, 20, 10 and 11 and the anomalies before moving down to the lower portion. He said he was not Planning Commission Minutes Page 12 of 22 March 27, 2019 d for her to be able to move back into the replacement home. She stated they are giving up two of their homes for the staging area, said they do not believe wildlife will be disturbed and believe the park will provide great benefits to the community. Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 22 March 27, 2019