Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT J: PUBLIC COMMENTS 1 Pt S�►NTO N'/ <br /> From: Mike Carey <br /> Sent: Friday,June 14, 2019 12:27 AM <br /> To: Stefanie Ananthan; Megan Campbell; Shweta Bonn; Ellen Clark <br /> Subject: PUD Application process and city fee sheet- how to Kill Downtown options and progress <br /> Megan-(city of Pleasanton) please print the attachment below and include it with the email below for <br /> the June-26th planning Commission packet- <br /> » <br /> »Attached below- is the Planned Unit Development process application requirements. (PUD) <br /> »This process is generally used for a subdivision/lot split, master planned community or a large <br /> commercial project that has special circumstances or needs rezoning. <br /> » Now our city leaders and planning department are proposing to condition this requirement and <br /> application process on Every Straight Zoned Lot in the Central Commercial district of downtown <br /> Pleasanton. <br /> » Please Do NOT support this hardship and burdensome process from the Downtown owners parcels. <br /> »The current zoning for the past 70 years has allowed these uses as a standard straight zoned use, <br /> there is no need to change it to a PUD process. <br /> Prepared for the June 26,2019, Planning Commission Meeting 15 <br />e Or <br /> explosion; <br /> C' 9esidentiaf projects, either only les dentiel it rn xed-use, require approval of a <br /> PlannK QP,i(Deyelooment(PUM. <br /> E Development in the MU-D district shall be swot t4 planned unit development <br /> review arid aootOval by City Council <br /> 18.46.430'Permitted and conditional rises <br /> Permitted arei ;pnditonal uses in the MU-Dan: MU-7 districts as provided in Table <br /> 18 44 080 <br /> 18 46,040 Prohibited uses. <br /> Any use not specifically permjl..Qr r ,Ijt QrlaAt y dpi fol in Table 18.44.080, unless <br /> a determination is made under Chapter 18.12:9 of this tale <br /> 18.46.050 Underground utilities. <br /> • Electric and commurric tion serve wird _te ,new ,rea t:re shill de placed <br /> inderorOun4 from the nearest utility pole tf the city engineer finds. upon ai r ltcat on by <br /> the property owner, that compliance is not feasible. he oi sne shall derma dilietent <br /> service arrangements.The property owner shall comply with the requirements of this <br /> -r •n Wit • t .x n : tth; n- - -r ,rr-n--ment with?ha <br /> public utility involved. <br /> !8.46c4-3,,,—Off street park.inq. <br /> A. 0V-street perkily 'aoilities shall be provided far eacrn use in the MU districts as <br /> vrescribed in Cnae er 18 and 18.E_020D o1 t iia titre_ <br /> B. In the Mixed Use districts,the Plannirxt Commission or City Council may allow <br /> shared parking; <br /> Praaper d tor lne May 2e.2019,Downtown apecmc Mon upivite Te*Fore*?Awing 10 <br /> Prepared for the June 26, 2019, Planning Commission Meeting 14 <br />dj, ricts.including retail.office personal services.looci <br /> 'ripsted for rhe May.28.2014 r)uwnxMn 3,3ec'kc Men Updax Task F.'c, t lael,rj 15 <br /> Prepared for the June 26, 2019, Planning Commission Meeting 13 <br /> 1 O <br /> Z <br /> N <br /> the CC district of the potential inconveniences associated with <br /> Prepared for the June 26, 2019, Planning Commission Meeting 5 <br />oidable impacts will result from implementation of the Plan.Having(i)adopted all feasible <br /> mitigation measures,as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;(ii) rejected alternatives to the Plan, <br /> as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;and(iii) recognized the significant unavoidable impacts of <br /> the Plan, the City Council hereby finds that each of the separate benefits of the proposed Plan, as stated <br /> herein, is determined to be unto itself an overriding consideration, independent of other benefits, that <br /> warrants approval of the Plan and outweighs and overrides its significant unavoidable impacts,and thereby <br /> justifies the approval of the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan. <br /> 27 <br />would result in an operational emissions increase of 4,000 <br /> MTCO2e per year and an energy consumption increase of 168,000 million BTU per year compared <br /> to existing conditions. While the Plan would not be sufficient to align downtown Pleasanton's <br /> emissions trajectory with the goals established under SB 32 and EO S-3-05,implementation of the <br /> 26 <br />ntal <br /> 24 <br />iteria air pollutants <br /> 23 <br />