Laserfiche WebLink
1• <br /> EXHIBIT J: PUBLIC COMMENTS p�EASANT; N <br /> f <br /> _ <br /> SAM7 <br /> , tln++ntoan Speollc Plan Update <br /> Fleasanlcn ke.,nrcipal Code Amendments <br /> Item 3-ATTACHMENT 5 <br /> 18.08 338 Mixed Use development. <br /> 'Mixed Use development'means a project that integrates tw,a 9r more of the following <br /> land uses in aLngle building orgt a single site:office,ccmr*lercial. residential,or other <br /> use determined by the director of community development ott:co retai°° or industrial <br /> uidential ucoo. <br /> Chapter 18.44 C Commercial Districts <br /> la 4'l 080 Permitted and conditional uses. <br /> A Permitted uses and uses subject to a minor conditional use permit or <br /> conditional use permit in a C district are provided In Table 18.44.080 at the <br /> end of this section. A developmentDroiect with a residential component <br /> within the Downtown S -an area ar• in ,= C-C distil h SII ,- <br /> subieCt to P1aan d Unit Developmentappraval. <br /> Multi-family dwellings and Mixed Use development wit a residential <br /> componentshail be permitted in the C-C district with PlanrieeJ Unit <br /> Jfevelopment approval arra provided that ( ,j:there shall be not less than <br /> 1,0°0 square feet of site area per dwelling unit,and 121 preaAckle4hat <br /> dwelling units not located above a permitted nonresidential use shall be <br /> subjected to the requirements for usable open space per dwelling unit of the ' <br /> RM-1,500 district,or, if applicable,the Core Area Overlay district. <br /> Yards and courts at and above the first level occupied by dwelling units shall <br /> be as required by Section 18.84.100 of this title, except that where no side or <br /> rear yard rs required for a nonresidential use on the site,no side or rear yard <br /> need be provided except when required by the Building Code for adjoining <br /> walls with openings. <br /> C. Any other use which is determined by the zoning administrator or planning <br /> commission,as applicable, as provided in Chapter 18.128 of this title,to be <br /> similar to the uses listed in this section shall be a permitted use or a <br /> conditional use in the districts in which the uses to which it is similar are <br /> permitted uses or conditional uses <br /> pt1eC r<x the May 25,2079,oce ricran 8peathc an tpaiats rank Force M9etonp a <br /> Prepared for the June 26, 2019, Planning Commission Meeting 10 <br />ith this policy change? <br /> Prepared for the June 26, 2019, Planning Commission Meeting 7 <br />rdinance <br /> We strongly encourage the Task Force to support our efforts to establish a Right to Do <br /> Business Ordinance in Downtown_The intent of such an ordinance is to protect the <br /> vibrant uses intended for our Downtown Core from conflicts with other private and <br /> public uses in the Downtown. Living in and around a Downtown is wonderful and lively <br /> but can come with increased noise and activity levels. This ordinance would advise <br /> stakeholders within the CC district of the potential inconveniences associated with <br /> Prepared for the June 26, 2019, Planning Commission Meeting 5 <br />oidable impacts will result from implementation of the Plan.Having(i)adopted all feasible <br /> mitigation measures,as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;(ii) rejected alternatives to the Plan, <br /> as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;and(iii) recognized the significant unavoidable impacts of <br /> the Plan, the City Council hereby finds that each of the separate benefits of the proposed Plan, as stated <br /> herein, is determined to be unto itself an overriding consideration, independent of other benefits, that <br /> warrants approval of the Plan and outweighs and overrides its significant unavoidable impacts,and thereby <br /> justifies the approval of the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan. <br /> 27 <br />would result in an operational emissions increase of 4,000 <br /> MTCO2e per year and an energy consumption increase of 168,000 million BTU per year compared <br /> to existing conditions. While the Plan would not be sufficient to align downtown Pleasanton's <br /> emissions trajectory with the goals established under SB 32 and EO S-3-05,implementation of the <br /> 26 <br />ntal <br /> 24 <br />iteria air pollutants <br /> 23 <br />