2_Exhibits I-J - Laserfiche WebLink

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Verification Timing of Responsibility for Verification Complete Verification Verification Date Initial Boulevard at Valley proposed. City shall Traffic Avenue/Junipero Street require payments of Engineering extending beyond the Transportation Division available storage in the Impact Fees as AM peak hour in the applicable. cumulative with project condition. Construction of bicycle TRA-9:Conduct a feasibility study for City shall conduct a Immediately City of facilities proposed by the the proposed bicycle and pedestrian feasibility study for following Pleasanton Proposed Plan would facilities in the Proposed Plan.Should the proposed approval of Community not be consistent with the facilities be deemed feasible,amend bicycle and Downtown Development the bicycle facilities the City's Bicycle and Pedestrian Master pedestrian facilities. Specific Plan Department, contemplated for the Plan to reflect the bicycle and pedestrian City shall amend Traffic downtown area in the improvements included in the Proposed either the City's Engineering City's Bicycle and Plan. Should improvements been Bicycle and Division Pedestrian Master Plan. deemed infeasible, amend the Proposed Pedestrian Master Plan. Plan or the Proposed Plan to reflect the findings of the study. I3 left-turn pocket through applicant Pleasanton would result in vehicle to 300-feet or construct a second traffic studies as Community queues at the northbound left-turn lane and associated development Development intersection of Sunol receiving lane. projects are Department, l2 projects are Department, Avenue/Old Bernal proposed. City shall Traffic Avenue at Bernal require payments of II s are Department, and southbound left-turn proposed. City shall Traffic queues are projected to require payments of Engineering exceed the available Transportation Division storage.The addition of Impact Fees as the Proposed Plan traffic applicable. would increase the 10 l project-related mitigation measures. ption of Statement of Overriding Considerations The City Council has weighed the economic,legal,social,technological,and other benefits of the proposed Plan,as set forth above in Section II.D,against the significant unavoidable impacts of the Plan identified in the Draft EIR(and discussed above in Section II.A). The City Council hereby determines that those benefits outweigh the risks and adverse environmental impacts of the Plan,and further determines that the Plan's significant unavoidable impacts are acceptable. Accordingly, the City Council adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations, recognizing that significant unavoidable impacts will result from implementation of the Plan.Having(i)adopted all feasible mitigation measures,as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;(ii) rejected alternatives to the Plan, as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;and(iii) recognized the significant unavoidable impacts of the Plan, the City Council hereby finds that each of the separate benefits of the proposed Plan, as stated herein, is determined to be unto itself an overriding consideration, independent of other benefits, that warrants approval of the Plan and outweighs and overrides its significant unavoidable impacts,and thereby justifies the approval of the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan. 27 would result in an operational emissions increase of 4,000 MTCO2e per year and an energy consumption increase of 168,000 million BTU per year compared to existing conditions. While the Plan would not be sufficient to align downtown Pleasanton's emissions trajectory with the goals established under SB 32 and EO S-3-05,implementation of the 26 ntal 24 iteria air pollutants 23