2_Exhibits I-J - Laserfiche WebLink

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Verification Timing of Responsibility for Verification Complete Verification Verification Date Initial energy efficient than the current Building and Energy Efficiency Standards; • Provide a 15-percent offset in building envelope energy use through use of renewable energy (e.g. photovoltaic,wind); • Provide a combination of energy reductions and renewable energy offsets to meet the overall 15- percent reduction in building energy use The I5-percent reduction in building envelope energy use shall be based on the current Building and Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6,of the California Building Code)that is in place at the time building permits are submitted to the City.Architectural plans submitted to the City Building Division shall identify the requirement to reduce building energy use by IS percent and/or provide renewable energy to meet this requirement. c) Require applicants for non-residential projects that employ 20 of more people—which is equivalent to 12,000 square feet of retail space,6,000 square feet of office space, 20,000 square feet of industrial space, or 22 hotel rooms to implement an employee commute trip reduction (CTR) program.The CTR program shall identify alternative modes of transportation to the project, 8 ductions should be achieved over baseline water use conditions in the City at the time of development. b) Require applicants for future projects within the planning area to implement one or more of the following energy efficiency measures: • Design individual habitable residential and non-residential structures to be 15 percent more 7 residential,schools, hospitals, nursing homes), as measured from the property line of a proposed Project to the property line of the nearest sensitive 4 following consists of a monitoring program table noting the responsible entity for mitigation monitoring,the timing,and a list of all project-related mitigation measures. ption of Statement of Overriding Considerations The City Council has weighed the economic,legal,social,technological,and other benefits of the proposed Plan,as set forth above in Section II.D,against the significant unavoidable impacts of the Plan identified in the Draft EIR(and discussed above in Section II.A). The City Council hereby determines that those benefits outweigh the risks and adverse environmental impacts of the Plan,and further determines that the Plan's significant unavoidable impacts are acceptable. Accordingly, the City Council adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations, recognizing that significant unavoidable impacts will result from implementation of the Plan.Having(i)adopted all feasible mitigation measures,as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;(ii) rejected alternatives to the Plan, as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;and(iii) recognized the significant unavoidable impacts of the Plan, the City Council hereby finds that each of the separate benefits of the proposed Plan, as stated herein, is determined to be unto itself an overriding consideration, independent of other benefits, that warrants approval of the Plan and outweighs and overrides its significant unavoidable impacts,and thereby justifies the approval of the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan. 27 would result in an operational emissions increase of 4,000 MTCO2e per year and an energy consumption increase of 168,000 million BTU per year compared to existing conditions. While the Plan would not be sufficient to align downtown Pleasanton's emissions trajectory with the goals established under SB 32 and EO S-3-05,implementation of the 26 ntal 24 iteria air pollutants 23