Laserfiche WebLink
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan <br /> I Purpose <br /> State of California Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(1) requires a lead or responsible <br /> agency that approves or carries out a project where an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has <br /> identified significant environmental effects to adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the <br /> changes made to the project or conditions of project approval,adopted in order to mitigate or avoid <br /> significant effects on the environment.The City of Pleasanton(the"City")is the lead agency for the <br /> EIR prepared for the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan(SCH No.2001032014),hereafter <br /> referred to as"Proposed Plan,"and therefore is responsible for the adoption and implementation <br /> of the required mitigation monitoring and reporting program.An EIR has been prepared for the <br /> Proposed Plan that addresses potential environmental impacts and, where appropriate, <br /> recommends measures to mitigate these impacts. <br /> The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared in conformance <br /> with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(1).It is the intent of this program to: <br /> 1. Verify satisfaction of the required mitigation measures of the EIR; <br /> 2. Provide a methodology to document implementation of the required mitigation; <br /> 3. Provide a record of the monitoring program; <br /> 4. Identify monitoring responsibility; <br /> 5. Establish administrative procedures for the clearance of mitigation measures; <br /> 6. Establish the frequency and duration of monitoring;and <br /> 7. Utilize existing review processes wherever feasible. <br /> The MMRP describes the procedures that will be used to implement the mitigation measures <br /> adopted in connection with the approval of the Proposed Plan and the methods of monitoring such <br /> actions. A monitoring program is necessary only for impacts which would be significant if not <br /> mitigated. <br /> If,during the course of project implementation,any of the mitigation measures identified cannot <br /> be successfully implemented,the City shall immediately inform any affected responsible agencies. <br /> The City,in conjunction with any affected responsible agencies,will then determine if modification <br /> to the project is required,and/or whether alternative mitigation is appropriate. <br /> The following consists of a monitoring program table noting the responsible entity for mitigation <br /> monitoring,the timing,and a list of all project-related mitigation measures. <br />ption of Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> The City Council has weighed the economic,legal,social,technological,and other benefits of the proposed <br /> Plan,as set forth above in Section II.D,against the significant unavoidable impacts of the Plan identified in <br /> the Draft EIR(and discussed above in Section II.A). <br /> The City Council hereby determines that those benefits outweigh the risks and adverse environmental <br /> impacts of the Plan,and further determines that the Plan's significant unavoidable impacts are acceptable. <br /> Accordingly, the City Council adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations, recognizing that <br /> significant unavoidable impacts will result from implementation of the Plan.Having(i)adopted all feasible <br /> mitigation measures,as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;(ii) rejected alternatives to the Plan, <br /> as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;and(iii) recognized the significant unavoidable impacts of <br /> the Plan, the City Council hereby finds that each of the separate benefits of the proposed Plan, as stated <br /> herein, is determined to be unto itself an overriding consideration, independent of other benefits, that <br /> warrants approval of the Plan and outweighs and overrides its significant unavoidable impacts,and thereby <br /> justifies the approval of the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan. <br /> 27 <br />would result in an operational emissions increase of 4,000 <br /> MTCO2e per year and an energy consumption increase of 168,000 million BTU per year compared <br /> to existing conditions. While the Plan would not be sufficient to align downtown Pleasanton's <br /> emissions trajectory with the goals established under SB 32 and EO S-3-05,implementation of the <br /> 26 <br />ntal <br /> 24 <br />iteria air pollutants <br /> 23 <br />