Laserfiche WebLink
feet of industrial space,or 22 hotel rooms to implement an employee commute trip reduction <br /> (CTR)program. The CTR program shall identify alternative modes of transportation to the <br /> project, including transit schedules, bike and pedestrian routes, and carpool/vanpool <br /> availability. Information regarding these programs shall be readily available to employees <br /> and clients. The project applicant or designee shall implement at least one of the following <br /> incentives for commuters as part of the CTR program, or another equally effective incentive: <br /> • Ride-matching assistance(e.g.subsidized public transit passes) <br /> • Vanpool assistance or employer-provided vanpool/shuttle <br /> • Car-sharing program(e.g.Zipcar) <br /> • Bicycle end-trip facilities, including bike parking, lockers,and showers. <br /> Implementation of requirements listed in Mitigation Measure GHG-1 and Plan policies would significantly <br /> reduce GHG emissions in 2040. However,even implementation of all reasonable mitigation measures in <br /> tandem with all applicable existing policies and regulations would not be sufficient to achieve the 2040 <br /> efficiency threshold of 1.7 MTCO2e per service population that would indicate "substantial progress" <br /> towards the EO S-3-05 GHG emissions reduction target. <br /> (b) Effects of Plan Policies and Remaining Impacts:Effects of the Plan policies,including those aimed <br /> at reducing mobile emissions by promoting multi-modal transportation infrastructure,were factored into <br /> the above analysis to the extent that the reduction of GHGs from proposed policies could be quantified. <br /> Even accounting for these reductions,emissions levels under implementation of the Plan would exceed the <br /> significance threshold. <br /> (c) Rationale and Conclusion: Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would require new development to be <br /> energy and water efficient, reducing area emissions, and to provide commute trip reduction options, <br /> reducing mobile emissions.Compliance with mitigation measure GHG-1,Plan policies,and state and local <br /> policies and regulations including reduction goals provided in California's Renewable Portfolio Standard, <br /> Title 24 requirements and CAP exceedance goals,the City of Pleasanton General Plan,the City's Municipal <br /> Code,and the City's Climate Action Plan would significantly reduce overall GHG emissions below existing <br /> levels. However,the Plan would still not achieve the 2040 efficiency threshold of 1.7 MTCO2e per service <br /> population that would indicate "substantial progress" towards the EO S-3-05 GHG emissions reduction <br /> target. Therefore, the proposed Plan would result in a significant and unavoidable impact on the <br /> environment and the progress of climate change with respect to the generation of GHG emissions. The <br /> impact is found to be significant and unavoidable under 14 CCR Section 15091(a)(2). This potential <br /> unavoidable significant impact is acceptable and overridden as set forth below in the Statement of <br /> Overriding Considerations.(Draft EIR,pp.3.5-31 to 3.5-43.) <br /> Impact 3.5-2: Development under the Plan would conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation <br /> adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. <br /> (a) Facts in Support of Finding: Assembly Bill (AB) 32 and EO S-03-05 set targets for State GHG <br /> reductions of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 and 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. The 2017 <br /> CARB Scoping Plan creates a pathway to achieving those goals by reducing GHG emissions to 4.0 MTCO2e <br /> per capita by 2030 and 2.0 MTCO2e per capita by 2050.The Plan would support the intent of the Scoping <br /> Plan; however, it may conflict with the thresholds required by the Scoping Plan under EO S-3-05. <br /> BAAQMD's CEQA Guidelines,as discussed in the Methodology and Assumptions section,builds upon the <br /> CARB per capita thresholds by creating an efficiency threshold that uses service population in lieu of <br /> resident population,which is more appropriate for a land use plan,such as the Plan. <br /> 18 <br />easures to reduce risk may <br /> include but are not limited to: <br /> - Air intakes located away from high volume roadways and/or truck loading zones. <br /> - Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems of the buildings provided with appropriately <br /> sized maximum efficiency rating value(MERV)filters. <br /> 13 <br />