2_Exhibits A-C - Laserfiche WebLink

EXHIBIT C District by activating the streets off Main Street with commercial and trying to integrate the arroyo as a public benefit. To eliminate commercial would be inconsistent with the goals of the Downtown Specific Plan.At this point she cannot support the annotation of 100% residential on it but supports the annotation of a Mixed Use Transitional with a PUD. She added it would be beneficial to take the time and develop a creative use for the property. MOTION: It was m/s by Narum/Pentin to have an annotation on the property located at 4212 First Street with 100% residential via a PUD and add an annotation on the property at 475-493 St. John Street, excluding the residents, annotating the Mixed Use Transitional with a PUD. Councilmember Pentin confirmed currently, an application for mixed—use could be submitted for Barone property without a PUD. Director of Community Development Beaudin responded affirmatively but stated they would probably be asking for a PUD, quickly, because of development standards and other constraints on the site, including parking. Councilmember Brown stated she does not like for pieces of property zoned differently on the outliers, noted there is a need for a gas station in the area, and wondered if Council should not wait for the DSP. Councilmember Narum noted residents are concerned with the blighted condition of the Shell Station. Councilmember Pentin withdrew his second and asked that the motion be restated to address the two properties, separately. Councilmember Narum withdrew her motion. MOTION: It was m/s by Narum/Pentin to annotate the property located at 4212 First Street with 100% residential via a PUD and require a workshop detailing the application through a public process. Councilmember Testa wondered why the item could not be addressed in the regular review process instead of waiting for the completion of the DSP. She stated she would not support taking it out of a standard process. Motion passed by the following votes: Ayes: Councilmembers Brown, Narum, Pentin, Mayor Thorne Noes: Councilmember Testa Absent: None MOTION: It was m/s by Narum/Pentin to annotate the property at 475 - 493 St. John Street, excluding the residents, with Mixed Use Transitional through a PUD. Mayor Thorne asked for clarification and City Manager Fialho explained that under Mixed Use Transitional, the square footage of the restaurant would have to be preserved or redeveloped and residential could go behind a structure or up above. Councilmember Pentin noted they would have the right to do this as a commercial property and can ask fora mixed-use project that would require a PUD and a mixed use transitional with annotation of the map. The annotation offers a separate opportunity. Councilmember Brown questioned where restaurant customers would park. Staff responded that parking would have to be included in the development plan. Councilmember Testa stated she is confused as to why this is different, noting it is a process, but it is going out of the process and it seems inappropriate to do so. She referenced discussions in a previous meeting that the applicant would incur additional costs if they were not under the DSP and stated she is uncomfortable making a decision outside of the process, instead of a consideration of a cost/benefit. Excerpt: City Council Minutes, May 7, 2019 Page 6 of 7 d want residential for consistency on that side of the street. She expressed her support in annotating the residential with a PUD on the Downtown Specific Plan Land Use Diagram and felt it is consistent with the Downtown Specific Plan Goals of preserving and protecting residential neighborhoods and having them continue to be a desirable place to live. Should this pass,there should be a demand of the property owner to schedule a workshop with the Planning Commission to discuss the type and density. She referenced the Barone property and noted the goal is to increase the vitality and the vibrancy of the Commercial Excerpt: City Council Minutes, May 7, 2019 Page 5 of 7 elopment Beaudin explained it would be allowed, including on Main Street, as a PUD, which has conflicting policies and would be a community conversation. He added there are policies and standards that address on-site development compatibility between two properties including visibility from the street. Additionally, if a downtown property owner comes forward after the document is Excerpt: City Council Minutes, May 7, 2019 Page 1 of 7 opened the public hearing. Excerpt: City Council Minutes, April 16, 2019 Page 2 of 8 residential units in the back, Director of Community Development Beaudin reported there is a policy in the draft plan that prohibits new curb cuts and staff will ensure access is provided without impacting Main Street. In reply to Excerpt: City Council Minutes, April 16, 2019 Page 1 of 8