My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2_Exhibits A-C
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
06-26
>
2_Exhibits A-C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2019 3:20:49 PM
Creation date
6/14/2019 3:20:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/26/2019
Document Relationships
2
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\06-26
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT B <br /> Howard Tsztoo referenced articles in the Pleasanton Weekly and results of a survey indicating 51% or <br /> more oppose residential in the downtown commercial area and over 90% do not want ground-level <br /> residential. He referenced the prohibition of three-or four-story structures behind shallow store front retail <br /> and referred to the recently build Spring Street structure that he concerned an eyesore. He felt mixed- <br /> use areas downtown should be amended and commented on the Barone property offering a great <br /> opportunity, but not for residential. <br /> Diane Envent referenced results of a survey relative to density; felt the real issue is how it feels and how <br /> it reflects the City's values and vision and noted people want the downtown core protected at two stories. <br /> She referenced challenges with the Starbucks building asserting it is shoved in like an ocean liner on a <br /> little street; referenced comments about tying in smaller streets to Main Street and reported people are <br /> struggling to keep Main Street vital. She discussed the importance of maintaining the small-town light <br /> and space that gives vibrancy, attractiveness, and invitation to mingle and economic vitality. <br /> Laura Olson, Executive Director of the Pleasanton Downtown Association and member of the Task Force, <br /> thanked everyone for their hard work on this process; discussed heights and FAR; noted the Task Force <br /> did not recommend changing anything in the commercial core and wanted clear and consistent zoning. <br /> She stated support to keep the 46-foot height and for the master design. <br /> Sandra Yamaoda reported participating and encouraging others to complete the survey and stated she <br /> does not support residential in the commercial core area of downtown or the height of 46 feet. She felt <br /> the Task Force veered away from the goal of increasing the vitality and maintaining the small-town feel <br /> in downtown. She opposed housing backing up to commercial buildings in the core area; noted parking <br /> and circulation are huge issues and asked Council instruct the Task Force and staff to consider the results <br /> of the survey and community emails and change the recommendations to reflect the desire and concerns <br /> of the community. <br /> Mike Carey commented on the work of volunteers, staff and the Task Force and asked Council to respect <br /> their time and commitment to the process and their recommendations as to what is best for Pleasanton. <br /> He reported no one supports ground-floor residential on Main Street and no one wants four stories. He <br /> provided examples of existing housing behind commercial uses; asked Council to preserve the existing <br /> zoning code to maintain the small-town character of downtown and the rights of seven years of the City's <br /> evolution. He noted if Council votes to change the allowed uses, what exists today could not be built and <br /> reported the PDA, the Chamber and the Downtown Owners Group all support no change. He urged <br /> Council to retain the current zoning and agreed with the idea of having 50 feet of commercial frontage. <br /> Mr. Carey discussed the City of Danville and reported their ordinance encourages residential in their <br /> downtown, as retail and residential compliment each other and addressed misinformation that has been <br /> circulated. <br /> Steve Van Dorn, President and CEO, Pleasanton Chamber of Commerce, referenced his letter to the <br /> City; reported supporting the Task Force and staffs recommendations except for the active ground-floor <br /> overlay and a request for more parking. He hoped additional parking will be considered in this plan before <br /> it is finalized. He suggested a good location would be behind the Museum on Main Street, and <br /> commented on partnering with various groups on this issue and commented positively on the <br /> collaboration. <br /> Kelly Cousins commended the Task Force for it work but felt it has veered considerably from the original <br /> proposal and the draft plan. She stated people have a sense of pride in the downtown area because of <br /> its quaint, small-town feel and spoke in opposition to adding residential there. She urged Council to <br /> consider a plan where everybody can continue to be proud of downtown. <br /> Laureen Green referenced a letter she submitted to the City and felt the survey and felt the plan has <br /> diverted from it. <br /> Excerpt: City Council Minutes, April 16, 2019 Page 3 of 8 <br />g and the State's intent on reducing costs <br /> and staff has not reduced or waived parking requirements as part of this update. He added that under <br /> SB 50, the corresponding issue will be the BART Station. <br /> Mayor Thorne opened the public hearing. <br /> Excerpt: City Council Minutes, April 16, 2019 Page 2 of 8 <br /> residential units in the back, <br /> Director of Community Development Beaudin reported there is a policy in the draft plan that prohibits <br /> new curb cuts and staff will ensure access is provided without impacting Main Street. In reply to <br /> Excerpt: City Council Minutes, April 16, 2019 Page 1 of 8 <br />