Laserfiche WebLink
• Mixed Use- Downtown. Staff initially recommended a 46-foot maximum height <br /> limit, for the MU-D district based on consideration of modern construction <br /> standards that typically call for a 15-foot minimum ground-floor plate height to <br /> accommodate commercial uses, with 10- to 12-foot plate heights for upper floors. <br /> 46-feet would allow ground-floor commercial with up to three floors of office or <br /> residential above. This approach is likely to result in more viable redevelopment <br /> of the area, based on the other public amenities desired for the area and <br /> necessary infrastructure upgrades for the - 13 acres of property. Furthermore, <br /> given that these development standards would apply only to City-owned <br /> property, the City itself will retain considerable control over the ultimate design <br /> and development of the site, ensuring that buildings are sited, designed and <br /> detailed to remain compatible with existing downtown development and adjacent <br /> neighborhoods. <br /> • Mixed Use- Transitional. Staff continues to believe that a 36-foot, rather than <br /> 40-foot height limit in the Mixed Use- Transitional district is appropriate, to <br /> maintain an appropriate transition between the commercial downtown (40-foot <br /> height limit) and residential neighborhoods (30-foot height limit). Recently- <br /> constructed residential and mixed-use projects have been successfully realized <br /> at heights at or below 36-feet, including: <br /> o 4693-4715 Augustine (25-feet): <br /> o 273 Spring Street (30-feet); and <br /> o 225 West Angela/446-458 Peters (34 feet-6 inches). <br /> The previously-suggested FAR limit (125-percent) for the Mixed-Use Transitional <br /> District is more realistic and appropriate given that properties will have a 36-foot <br /> height limit, and will need to include parking, on-site circulation, landscape areas, <br /> drainage, and so on. Given the transitional nature of this zone between the <br /> residential districts and the commercial districts, staff does not believe 300- <br /> percent is appropriate for this area. <br /> • Downtown Commercial. The 300-percent FAR and 40-foot height limit currently <br /> for the Downtown Commercial district are consistent with that currently permitted <br /> in the Downtown Commercial district. As shown in the examples above in Figure <br /> 1, the existing FAR allows a 3-story building occupying 100-percent of a site, <br /> which no existing development in the downtown today approaches. Nonetheless, <br /> the higher FAR provides additional flexibility new buildings with more lot <br /> coverage, appropriate for the commercial center of downtown. Staff believes <br /> these development standards are appropriate as the plan sets the parameters for <br /> the next 20 years of (re)development in the core commercial area. <br /> • Residential Planned Unit Developments. PUDs have routinely and <br /> successfully allowed the City to consider and approve deviations from <br /> development standards such as height and FAR, taking into account factors such <br /> as location, design, public benefits/amenities, and site and project-specific <br /> conditions. Allowing residential PUDs to exceed 30-feet will not change that. If a <br /> residential component to a project is proposed in the downtown core, limiting it to <br /> Page 14 of 15 <br />d we should maximize value and volume of use we <br /> can get on the land of this downtown (MU-D) area. Construction today tends to have higher <br /> plate heights and limited this area to 40-feet will only yield two-stories and really restrict any <br /> additional height/floors. However, given the right location and design, the Council may want <br /> to allow three-stories in some instances. Another comment agrees with the Task Force <br /> recommendation in terms of allowing additional heights so the projects can be reviewed on <br /> an individual basis. The final comment requested the note about limiting PUDs to 30-feet be <br /> stricken from the DSP to allow additional flexibility especially given modern construction. <br /> Summary of February 26, 2019 Downtown Specific Plan Update Task Force Meeting Page 6 of 7 <br />c Plan Update Task Force Meeting Page 5 of 7 <br />