My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 2192
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
2101 - 2200
>
ORD 2192
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2023 4:22:26 PM
Creation date
6/11/2019 11:55:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/4/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Tags
Ordinance
Description:
Ordinance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ordinance No. 2192 <br /> Page 6 <br /> B. A refund is specifically authorized by resolution of the city council adopted pursuant to <br /> Government Code Section 66001(d). Such amounts shall be refunded by the city to the then- <br /> current record owners of the development on a prorated basis. The city may effect such <br /> refunding by direct payment, or by providing credit towards future capital facilities fees, or by <br /> any other means consistent with the intent of Government Code Section 66001. <br /> 3.22.100 Appeals. A developer may appeal to the city council any determination made <br /> pursuant to this chapter. All appeals shall be in a form prescribed by the community <br /> development director and shall be filed within 15 days of the date of mailing to the developer <br /> any written notice of the applicable determination. Any appeal not filed within such period shall <br /> be deemed waived. The city council shall set the matter for hearing within 45 days of the date <br /> of receipt by the city clerk of the notice of the appeal. <br /> 3.22.110 Expiration of fee. The fees required by this chapter shall expire when the <br /> public facilities are completed and all debt service related to such public improvements are paid <br /> and satisfied. <br /> 3.22.120 Supplementary provisions. It is the intent of the city council that the fees required <br /> by this chapter shall be supplementary to the fees, dedications or conditions imposed upon <br /> development pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, California Environmental <br /> Quality Act, and other state laws and city ordinances, policies or conditions which may <br /> authorize the imposition of fees, dedications or conditions thereon. <br /> 3.22.130 Severability. The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to any person, <br /> association, corporation or to any property as to whom or which it is beyond the power of the <br /> city to impose the fee provided in this chapter. If any sentence. clause, section or part of this <br /> chapter, or any fee imposed upon any person or entity is found to be unconstitutional, illegal, or <br /> invalid, such unconstitutionality, illegality or invalidity shall affect only such sentence, clause, <br /> section or part of this chapter, and shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions, <br /> sentences, clauses, sections or other parts of this chapter, or its effect on other persons or <br /> entities. It is declared to be the intention of the city council that this chapter would have been <br /> adopted had such unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid sentence, clause, section or part of this <br /> chapter had not been included herein; or had such person or entity been expressly exempted <br /> from the application of this chapter. To this end, the provisions of this chapter are severable. <br /> • Chapter 3.26 Traffic Development Fee is amended to read as follows: <br /> Chapter 3.26 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEE <br /> 3.26.010 Purpose. City council finds that the cumulative impact of all new development under <br /> the general plan will result in adverse impacts to traffic circulation. To prevent these <br /> undesirable consequences, transportation improvements must be provided at a rate which will <br /> accommodate the expected growth in the city. The city council acknowledges that the demand <br /> for transportation improvements is shared by existing as well as new development. The <br /> proposed transportationdevelopment fee (formerly the traffic development fee) apportions the <br /> cost of the necessary transportation improvements and reconstruction among the different <br /> categories of new and existing users according to the reasonably estimated peak hour trip <br /> demand that each group of users places upon transportation improvements. <br /> 3.26.020 Terms and definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following terms shall <br /> have the meanings indicated in this section: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.