Laserfiche WebLink
Updated Arborist Report HortScience I Bartlett Consulting <br /> Sarvana Chilla, 3987 Stanley Page 5 <br /> Each tree was rated for suitability for preservation based upon its age, health, structural condition <br /> and ability to safely coexist within a development environment(see Tree Assessment in Exhibits <br /> and Table 2). We consider trees with high suitability for preservation to be the best candidates <br /> for preservation. We do not recommend retention of trees with poor suitability for preservation in <br /> areas where people or property will be present. Retention of trees with moderate suitability for <br /> preservation depends upon the intensity of proposed site changes. <br /> Table 2. Tree suitability for preservation <br /> 3987 Stanley, Pleasanton, CA <br /> Common Name Suitability for Preservation Total <br /> Low Moderate High <br /> California black <br /> walnut - 1 - 1 <br /> Crape Myrtle 1 - - 1 <br /> Glossy privet - 1 - 1 <br /> Italian alder - 1 - 1 <br /> Lemon - - 1 1 <br /> Plum 3 - - 3 <br /> Sweetgum - - 1 1 <br /> Valley oak - - 2 2 <br /> Windmill palm - - 8 8 <br /> Total 4 3 12 19 <br /> Evaluation of Impacts <br /> In evaluating the potential impact to trees, I reviewed the Site Plans prepared by Ken McCoy <br /> dated September 15, 2018, Utility, Drainage and Grading Plans by Ken McCoy dated September <br /> 2017 were included. The proposed project would construct three new buildings, adjoining <br /> sidewalks and a driveway along the eastern portion of the property. Surveyed tree trunk locations <br /> were included on Topography Plan prepared by Pacific Land Surveys dated November 2016. <br /> Using the proposed plans, potential impacts from construction were estimated for each tree. The <br /> most significant impact to the trees would occur as a result of the construction of building pads. <br /> Trees#2-7 are within the construction envelope of building#1. Trees#8 and 9 are within the <br /> construction envelope of building#2. These trees would not likely survive and I recommend <br /> removal. The only tree impacted by the construction of new buildings that qualifies as a Heritage <br /> Tree was plum tree#6. <br /> Tree#1 was off-site in front of the house and 2' east of the driveway. The canopy extended over <br /> the property by 3' and the new driveway would be within the dripline of the tree. The driveway is <br /> to be installed 5'from the tree. The excavation for the new driveway may involve additional <br /> impacts imposed on the tree roots and the canopy. <br /> Tree#18 was located on the eastern property line. The canopy extended over the property by <br /> 31' and the new driveway would be within the dripline of the tree. The excavation for the new <br /> driveway will involve significant impacts imposed on the tree roots as well as the canopy of the <br /> tree. This tree qualifies as a Heritage Tree. The latest plans indicated that a gravel driveway is <br /> not always <br /> appropriate for retention. This is particularly true when indigenous species are displaced. <br /> The California Invasive Plant Inventory Database (http://www.cal-ipc.org/paf/) lists <br /> species identified as being invasive. Pleasanton is part of the Central West Floristic <br /> Province. There were no species on this site found on the invasive plant inventory list. <br />