My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
5_Exhibits A-C
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
06-12
>
5_Exhibits A-C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2019 9:27:18 AM
Creation date
6/5/2019 9:27:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/12/2019
Document Relationships
5
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\06-12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Updated Arborist Report <br /> 3987 Stanley <br /> Pleasanton, CA <br /> Introduction and Overview <br /> You are planning to construct multiple housing units on the property you recently purchased. The <br /> large lot had a house, detached garage, two out buildings and was moderately forested. The <br /> City of Pleasanton requires that an Arborist Report be prepared as part of project submittals. <br /> This report provides the following information: <br /> 1. An evaluation of the health and structural condition of the trees within the proposed <br /> project area based on a visual inspection from the ground. <br /> 2. An assessment of the impacts of constructing the proposed project on the trees. <br /> 3. An appraisal value of the trees according to the procedures described in the Guide for <br /> Plant Appraisal(Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers). <br /> 4. Guidelines for tree preservation prior to and during the demolition and construction <br /> phases of development. <br /> Tree Assessment Methods <br /> Trees were assessed on December 8, 2016. The survey included trees 6" in diameter and <br /> greater, located on the property and adjacent to property lines. The assessment procedure <br /> consisted of the following steps: <br /> 1. Identifying the tree as to species; <br /> 2. Tagging each tree with an identifying number and recording its location on a map; <br /> 3. Measuring the trunk diameter at a point 4.5' above grade; <br /> 4. Evaluating the health and structural condition using a scale of 1 —5: <br /> 5-A healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of signs and symptoms of disease, with <br /> good structure and form typical of the species. <br /> 4-Tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor structural <br /> defects that could be corrected. <br /> 3-Tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning of <br /> crown, poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that might be mitigated with <br /> regular care. <br /> 2-Tree in decline, epicormic growth, extensive dieback of medium to large <br /> branches, significant structural defects that cannot be abated. <br /> 1 -Tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and/or trunk; most of foliage <br /> from epicormics; extensive structural defects that cannot be abated. <br /> 5. Rating the suitability for preservation as "high", "moderate" or"low". Suitability for <br /> preservation considers the health, age and structural condition of the tree, and its <br /> potential to remain an asset to the site for years to come. <br /> High: Trees with good health and structural stability that have the potential <br /> for longevity at the site. <br /> Moderate: Trees with somewhat declining health and/or structural defects than <br /> can be abated with treatment. The tree will require more intense <br /> management and monitoring, and may have shorter life span than <br /> those in `high'category. <br />s, and materials? <br /> Conclusion Discussion Point#3 <br /> 3. What other information would assist the Commission in its decision on the proposal? Do <br /> you have any other comments on the project? <br /> PUD-133, 3987 Stanley Boulevard Planning Commission <br /> 10 of 11 <br />ct application <br /> is formally presented to the Planning Commission. The first two questions below are topical <br /> PUD-133, 3987 Stanley Boulevard Planning Commission <br /> 9 of 11 <br />