Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. PC-2019-11 <br /> Page Three <br /> provisions and requirements of the City's zoning ordinance and the approved <br /> PUD for Hacienda. <br /> Section 2: Findings for Design Review Approval <br /> With respect to the approval of the Design Review (Case P19-0049), the Planning <br /> Commission finds that the project was reviewed and approved based on the nine <br /> criteria as required by Section 18.20.030 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code which <br /> include the following: <br /> 1. Preservation of the natural beauty of the city and the project site's relationship to <br /> it; <br /> 2. Appropriate relationship of the proposed building to its site, including transition <br /> with streetscape, public views of the buildings, and scale of buildings within its <br /> site and adjoining buildings; <br /> 3. Appropriate relationship of the proposed building and its site to adjoining areas, <br /> including compatibility of architectural styles, harmony in adjoining buildings, <br /> attractive landscape transitions, and consistency with neighborhood character; <br /> 4. Preservation of views enjoyed by residents, workers within the city, and <br /> passersby through the community; <br /> 5. Landscaping designed to enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas, <br /> provide shade, and conform to established streetscape; <br /> 6. Relationship of exterior lighting to its surroundings and to the building and <br /> adjoining landscape; <br /> 7. Architectural style, as a function of its quality of design and relationship to its <br /> surroundings; the relationship of building components to one another/the <br /> building's colors and materials; and the design attention given to mechanical <br /> equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings; <br /> 8. Integration of signs as part of the architectural concept; and <br /> 9. Architectural concept of miscellaneous structures, street furniture, public art in <br /> relationship to the site and landscape. <br /> With respect to the above criteria, the Planning Commission finds that the project would <br /> preserve and enhance the City's aesthetic values and ensure the preservation of the <br /> public health, safety and general welfare since it would be consistent with the allowable <br /> height, setbacks and other pertinent development standards of the PUD-I/C-O (Planned <br /> Unit Development — Industrial/Commercial-Office) District in which it is located. <br />are <br /> designed per City standards to provide safe ingress and egress into and out of <br /> the site. In addition, there is adequate parking available to meet the project's <br /> demand. Conditions have also been included that would require the applicant to <br /> mitigate any future nuisances as a result of the proposed use. <br /> C. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable <br /> provisions of the zoning ordinance. <br /> The site's zoning conditionally permits preschools. Granting a CUP for the <br /> proposed use would be consistent with the City's ability to regulate zoning as <br /> listed in Chapter 18.124 of the Municipal Code. In addition, the Planning <br /> Commission finds that, as conditioned, the proposed use will comply with all <br />ion to determine if the <br /> health risks would be below the thresholds established by the Bay Area Air Quality <br /> Management District (BAAQMD). The results of the report found that the preschool and play <br /> area would not be exposed to significant health risks from existing sources of air pollution and <br /> P19-0048 and P19-0049, 5950 Stoneridge Drive Planning Commission <br /> 8 of 10 <br /> ` <br /> (E) TENANT PARKING <br /> -c---- <br /> P19-0048 and P19-0049, 5950 Stoneridge Drive Planning Commission <br /> 5 of 10 <br />