2 - Laserfiche WebLink

the health risk would be below BAAQMD thresholds. A copy of the report is on file with the Planning Division. ALTERNATIVES As outlined in the above analysis, staff believes the use and design of the outdoor play area and related building and site modifications, as proposed and conditioned, would be compatible with the other uses in the vicinity and not create adverse impacts, and recommends the Planning Commission approve the project as proposed and conditioned. However, alternatives to the proposal that could be considered by the Planning Commission include: 1. The Commission could deny the entire project; or 2. The Planning Commission could approve the CUP and Design Review with modified hours of operation, modified number of students, or other changes such as playground design or building and/or site improvement changes. Since staff believes the findings to approve the project could be made as proposed and conditioned, staff recommends that neither of the two project alternatives above be pursued. PROS AND CONS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT Pros Cons Use is consistent with the General Plan and The proposal may increase traffic and zoning designation. parking demand; however, traffic/circulation and parking impacts would not be adverse. Provides child care and educational services for non-school-age children. Allows for expanded operation of an existing Pleasanton business. HACIENDA OWNERS ASSOCIATION The Hacienda Owners Association has reviewed the application for the proposed use and play area and found that it is in substantial compliance with Hacienda's guidelines set forth in the CC&R's (Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions). The Association believes that the use, parking, traffic, site and building modifications, including the play area, are compatible with currently approved uses within the subject area and, thereby, approved the proposed use, building and site changes. PUBLIC NOTICE Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a 1,000-foot radius of the site. Staff has provided the location and noticing maps as Exhibit C for reference. At the time this report was published, staff received no comments. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT This project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Sections: 15301, Existing Facilities, Class 1; 15303, New Construction or Conversation of Small Structures, Class 3; and 15304, Minor Alternations to Land, Class 4. Therefore, no environmental document accompanies this report. P19-0048 and P19-0049, 5950 Stoneridge Drive Planning Commission 9 of 10 on source. A health risk assessment is required when preschools are proposed within 1,000 feet of a roadway with average daily traffic of 10,000 or more trips. The proposed preschool and play area are located on Stoneridge Drive and within 1 ,000 feet of Hopyard Road, both of which have average daily traffic of more than 10,000 vehicles. Therefore, a health risk assessment report was required. The report estimates the health risks that children would be exposed to from nearby sources of air pollution to determine if the health risks would be below the thresholds established by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). The results of the report found that the preschool and play area would not be exposed to significant health risks from existing sources of air pollution and P19-0048 and P19-0049, 5950 Stoneridge Drive Planning Commission 8 of 10 ` (E) TENANT PARKING -c---- P19-0048 and P19-0049, 5950 Stoneridge Drive Planning Commission 5 of 10