My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
052219
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
>
2019
>
052219
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2019 11:30:18 AM
Creation date
5/16/2019 11:06:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/22/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br />Operations Services Department staff provides a regular update to this Committee regarding <br />the City's various efforts to implement.its CAP. <br />DISCUSSION <br />The City's contractor, PlaceWorks, completed Pleasanton's GHG inventories for 2005 and <br />2017. East Bay Energy Watch (EBEW) first contracted with. PlaceWorks in 2018 to develop <br />GHG inventories for 35 jurisdictions in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties for year 2017. <br />Staff then engaged the same firm separately to account for emissions associated with the <br />water/wastewater sector that were missing from the EBEW effort. In addition, Pleasanton's <br />baseline 2005 inventory was redone using the same methodology to allow for an -apples-to- <br />apples comparison. <br />In 2017, Pleasanton's community -wide emissions were estimated .to be 635,450 metric tons. <br />(MT) of carbon -dioxide equivalents (CO2e). Two results were derived for 2005, however. Using <br />demographic data from the US Census Bureau and California Department of Finance (DoF) for <br />2005, as they are being used for 2017, would yield 792,618 MT of CO2e. This would mean a <br />19.8% reduction when comparing 2017 to 2005 emissions. Substituting with demographic data <br />from the Association -of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) for 2005, while still using DoF and US_ <br />Census' data -for 2017, would indicate that Pleasanton had. 707,129 MT of emissions in 2005. <br />This would result in a less impressive 10.1 % reduction when comparing 2005 and 2017 <br />emissions. Staff notes, however, that during the same period, Pleasanton's population <br />increased by almost 10,000. <br />While it would be logical to simply rely -on. the US Census/DoF data for both years for <br />consistency sake, they assign abouta third of Alameda County's service population (residents <br />plus jobs) growth from 2004 to.2005 to Pleasanton, resulting in an extraordinary amount of Off - <br />Road GHG emissions for 2005. In any event, on a per -capita basis, Pleasanton has achieved <br />substantial GHG reductions -over the years. On a per -service -population basis, the community <br />has achieved- anywhere from 21-% to 27% of reduction in GHG emissions. And, 21 % to 30% of <br />reduction has been accomplished on a per -resident basis. <br />Staff has also compared Pleasanton's 2017 emissions to other East Bay communities. <br />Pleasanton ranks low (i.e., higher in GHG emissions) when the comparison is made on a per <br />resident basis. This is likely.due to the fact that Pleasanton also has a relatively high -number of' <br />jobs. This same pattern holds true for other seemingly high=emitting (on aper -resident basis) <br />jurisdictions such as Emeryville, San. Leandro, and Walnut Creek. As such, it unsurprising <br />that, on a per -service -population .basis, Pleasanton is more on par with other jurisdictions. All <br />of the above -will betaken into consideration when developing the next CAP in order to more <br />effectively and efficiently deploy the. City's limited resources to, effecting the most carbon: <br />reduction. <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.