My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
052119
>
04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2019 5:22:45 PM
Creation date
5/15/2019 4:57:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/21/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
04 ATTACHMENT 2
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\052119
04 ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\052119
04 ATTACHMENT 4
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\052119
04 ATTACHMENT 6
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\052119
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff met with the Moller Ranch Homeowners Association to discuss increased <br /> assessments to meet their repair/replacement capital improvement requirements. While <br /> there is not overwhelming support for an increase in the assessment amount, the <br /> Association is interested in exploring the cost and benefit aspects of an increase. <br /> With the assessment of two City-owned parcels, the City will pay $1,121. <br /> Increases to Assessments <br /> Assessments in each of the districts will remain unchanged this fiscal year. As stated in <br /> this report and in previous years' reports, assessments have not been increased in the <br /> LLMDs since they were created. Therefore, the current assessments are all based upon <br /> operation/maintenance costs and capital replacement costs that existed at the time the <br /> LLMDs were created. The districts, some to a greater degree, have operated year-to- <br /> year through a combination of reducing maintenance and depleting capital replacement <br /> reserves. This is due in large part to the complicated process required to increase <br /> assessments created by the passage of Proposition 218 in 1996. However, annual <br /> costs have and will continue to increase, and capital reserves have been depleted to the <br /> point that this operational strategy is no longer sustainable. The revenue in some <br /> districts, as detailed above, is no longer enough to cover the operation costs. In other <br /> districts, it is just keeping up with maintenance but is not growing a reserve as needed <br /> for capital repair and replacement. <br /> As managers of the LLMDs, staff is working with a consultant that specializes in LLMDs, <br /> SCI Consulting Group (SCI), to assist with analyzing the special benefit areas, the <br /> maintenance requirements, the capital replacement requirements, Proposition 218 <br /> compliance, and assessments paid by each property owner within the districts. As a first <br /> step in the process, SCI reviewed previous years' Engineering Reports and produced <br /> the Engineering Report for each LLMD this year. <br /> This coming year, SCI, with the assistance of the City's Landscape Architect, will be <br /> working to determine maintenance expectations and appropriate maintenance <br /> standards for each district, and determine the appropriate reserve amount to cover <br /> eventual capital replacements. When complete, required assessment increases will be <br /> calculated. The goal of this effort will be to fully understand the funding required to <br /> implement a sustainable landscape maintenance program in accordance with PUD <br /> requirements and special assessment district residents' expectations, and grow the <br /> capital reserve with an annual contribution to fund eventual replacement based upon an <br /> anticipated replacement cycle, for each LLMD. <br /> With this information, in the coming year SCI will assist the City with the public outreach <br /> and required Proposition 218-compliant voting process necessary to increase the <br /> assessments in the two Districts currently most underfunded, Windsor LLMD and Bonde <br /> Ranch LLMD. The results of these efforts will either be presented to the City Council <br /> during the current fiscal year, or when the fiscal year 2020/21 LLMD Engineer Reports <br /> are presented for adoption next year. Over the course of the next couple of years, the <br /> intention is to go through the same process for all five LLMDs so they are all sustainable <br /> into the future. It is likely that an annual escalator, such as a consumer price index <br /> Page 7 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.