Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Thorne suggested adding a condition that if there will be an entrance on Main Street, they <br /> must also have a rear entrance. <br /> Ensuing discussion pertained to having no residential units in the Civic Center site, adding <br /> residential to downtown commercial properties. <br /> Director of Community Development Beaudin asked whether Council would support parking on <br /> the ground level for self-parked residential. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Brown/Narum to prohibit ground-floor residential behind commercial <br /> properties on mixed uses downtown, not including parking. Motion passed by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Brown, Narum, Testa, Mayor Thorne <br /> Noes: Councilmember Pentin <br /> Absent: None <br /> Discussion followed regarding the rationale behind prohibiting residential units behind the <br /> downtown commercial district including that the space could be used for parking and the area is <br /> already intensified. <br /> Councilmember Pentin stated opposition adding that the Task Force and the City have better <br /> options that could be worked through; suggested sending it back the Planning Commission to vet <br /> the matter further and make a recommendation to Council. <br /> In response to Councilmember Brown regarding the kind of business that would be successful at <br /> 50 feet in, Director of Community Development Beaudin explained it is a minimum threshold and <br /> reported 50 feet is a commonly used number, but it goes up to 75 feet, depending on the market <br /> and the kind of businesses. <br /> Mayor Thorne reiterated the City can meet its Housing Element in the General Plan without <br /> housing in the commercial district. <br /> City Manager Fialho clarified that when considering the downtown commercial core, Council must <br /> think about areas such as Railroad Avenue and Spring Street and noted the motion on the floor <br /> also applies to those properties. He suggested modifying the motion to apply it only to Main Street <br /> having less of an impact on existing property owners who have the ability to put residential behind <br /> commercial on Railroad Avenue, Spring Street and other areas. <br /> Councilmember Brown asserted each of the projects that come through where the applicant <br /> wants an exception, they can apply; adding that if the City wants to make a more vibrant <br /> downtown the City will have to take residential off some areas and place more retail. <br /> Director of Community Development Beaudin noted that if the City removes the policies that <br /> facilitate residential on the ground floor, the typical use of PUDs and mis-matched policy <br /> framework applies; the policy is clear, and zoning is for commercial, and residential on the ground <br /> floor would be removed. There would be less flexibility unless it is built into the plan as part of the <br /> update. <br /> City Manager Fialho clarified, what staff is saying on non-Main Street options, is that the only <br /> residential on Main Street would be above commercial. Councilmember Narum added it would <br /> make existing residential non-conforming and Councilmember Brown indicated they will be <br /> grandfathered in. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 17 of 20 April 16, 2019 <br />