Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment 1 <br /> Resolution No.19-1078 <br /> SUMMARY OF CASA ELEMENT CONCERNS AND CONSIDERATIONS RECOMMENDED APPROACH TVC POLICY FRAMEWORK <br /> KEY THEMES <br /> 8. Unlock Public Lands for Affordable Housing: CONCERN STATUS: High. The Tri-Valley has varying Support with amendments as follows: I CONTEXT-SENSITIVE HOUSING <br /> Promote use of"surplus"and"underutilized" amounts of public land between cities.However,the remaining • Allow all cities(not just Sensitive Communities)to i BALANCED SOLUTIONS <br /> public lands(undefined)for affordable housing I public lands should include context sensitive community plans <br /> through legislative and regulatory changes. for each city. develop context sensitive community plans that <br /> 1 achieves the overall goal of providing affordable <br /> This would also create a database listing all <br /> CONCERNS:This is a one-size-fits-all approach that: housing around transit. <br /> publicly owned land in the Bay Area,limit • Ignores community context-creating potential land use <br /> approvalprocess to no more than two ears,and • Provide clear and objective standards for the <br /> pp y incompatibility issues with tall developments immediately bl <br /> deploy 10 percent of underutilized/surplus public adjacent to low density areas or within historic definition of"surplus land." <br /> land to affordable housing development on an districts/downtowns. <br /> annual basis. • Should prioritize land around existing or <br /> • Ignores the fact that not all public lands have the same approved transit stops <br /> Element also calls for policies to help expand the value for affordable housing development,as some large <br /> housing construction labor pool,including tracts of public land are located at the urban fringe,away • Requirero ects to be consistent with locally <br /> requiring trained apprentices and prevailing from transit and is inappropriate for housing development p 1 <br /> wages. Exceptions would apply to temporary adopted land use plans that are already in <br /> that leads to sprawl. <br /> housing built to address an emergency. place(e.g.specific plans)and consistent with <br /> • Ignores the fact that ability to deploy land is driven by objective local standards. <br /> Objective:Encourage re-use of public land for market forces,which cities do not control. <br /> mixed income/affordable housing units. <br /> Monitor any developing legislation regarding the <br /> • Disregards the efforts underway by local communities to "surplus/underutilized" <br /> As <br /> plan vacant lands around transit in a context-sensitive appropriate,definof advoca s for amendments <br /> lands.would <br /> advocate for amendments that would <br /> manner. allow: <br /> • Limits a city's ability to use good design and planning • Cities to partner with the public entity which owns <br /> techniques to integrate new affordable housing into the the surplus land to ensure projects are developed <br /> fabric of a community,which will likely result in further j in a manner consistent with local plans and design <br /> community resistance to affordable housing development. standards. <br /> • Lacks a definition for surplus and underutilized land and <br /> how this proposal relates to the exiting Surplus Land Act <br /> requirement to offer surplus land to affordable housing <br /> developers and other public agencies. 1 <br /> Page 7 <br />