PC-2019-01 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-2019-01 Page Four Section 2: Approves Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 8483, the application of Frank Berlogar to subdivide to subdivide an approximately 15.81-acre site located at 88 Silver Oak Terrace into two lots measuring approximately 4.46 acres and 11.35 acres, subject to the conditions shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made part of this case by reference. Section 3: This resolution shall become effective 15 days after its passage and adoption unless: (1) appealed prior to that time by any member of the public, or (2) if a City Councilmember wishes to review the item, pursuant to Pleasanton Municipal Code section 18.144.010, he or she must indicate their desire to review within 15 days following the date of approval, or at the next regular meeting of the City Council, whichever is later. If the majority of the City Council agrees to review the item, a further hearing shall be set pursuant to Pleasanton Municipal Code section 18.12.040 and the Council shall consider the item at that time. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton at a regular meeting help on February 20, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Allen, Balch, Brown, Ritter NOES: None ABSTAIN: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Commissioner O'Connor A T:ST: IP Ellen Clark Nancy A len Secretary, Planning Commission Chairpers. • APPROVED AS TO FORM: Julie Harryman Assistant City Attorney public health problems. G. The design of the subdivision or its related improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. There is an existing public trail easement which, with the approval of this Vesting Tentative Map. would be located on Parcel Two. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with this easement. H. The restriction on approving a tentative subdivision map on land covered by a land conservation contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act) is not applicable. The site is not covered by any land conservation contract. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision would not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The existing residences are connected to the City sanitary sewer system for conveyance to the sewer treatment plant. Stormwater has been treated as part of the prior subdivision improvements. Thus, this subdivision will not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB).