My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
25
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
041619
>
25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2019 2:12:01 PM
Creation date
4/10/2019 1:02:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/16/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
25 ATTACHMENT 2e
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\041619
25 ATTACHMENT 4
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\041619
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. PC-2018-11 <br /> Page Three <br /> Section 2: Criteria for Design Review Approval <br /> With respect to the Chabad of the Tri-Valley Design Review application, the Planning <br /> Commission finds that the project was reviewed and approved based on the nine criteria as <br /> required by Section 18.20.0.30 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code which include the following: <br /> 1. Preservation of the natural beauty of the.city and the project site's relationship to it; <br /> 2. Appropriate relationship of the proposed building to its site; including transition with <br /> streetscape, public views of the buildings, and scale of buildings within its site and <br /> adjoining buildings; <br /> 3. Appropriate relationship of the proposed building and its site to adjoining areas, <br /> including compatibility of architectural styles, harmony in adjoining buildings, attractive <br /> landscapetransitions, and consistency with neighborhood character; <br /> 4. Preservation of views enjoyed by residents, workers within the city, and passersby <br /> through the community; <br /> 5. Landscaping designed to enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas, provide <br /> shade, and conform to established streetscape; <br /> 6. Relationship of exterior lighting to its surroundings and to the building and adjoining <br /> landscape; <br /> 7. Architectural style, as a function of its quality of design and relationship to its <br /> surroundings; the relationship of building components to one another/the building's. <br /> colors and materials; and the design attention given to mechanical equipment or other <br /> utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings; <br /> 8. Integration of signs as part of the architectural concept; and <br /> 9. Architectural concept of miscellaneous structures, street furniture, public art in <br /> relationship to the site and landscape. <br /> With respect to the above criteria, the Planning Commission finds that the project would <br /> preserve and enhance the City's aesthetic values and ensure the preservation of the public <br /> health, safety and general welfare since the facility would be located within an existing building <br /> that is consistent with theallowable height, setbacks and other pertinent development <br /> standards of the RM-2,500 zoning district in which it is located. Minor exterior modifications to <br /> the building including the addition of new windows are proposed, specifications for which <br /> would be reviewed prior to issuance of a building permit to ensure that they are visually <br /> compatible with the building. The project would also upgrade existing landscaping, and install <br /> a new enclosed playground and outdoor terrace with solid wood fencing that would be <br /> consistent with other fencing on the project site an in the vicinity. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.