Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 2: Site Plan with Playground Location / ,v r r. <br /> 1i .,4 <br /> r <br /> ,..,. . 1 07 -bras <br /> I at <br /> { <br /> 2t 1! i <br /> 1 'tuts sat .. <br /> • A p <br /> 4 . ,. . ,. <br /> �, Existing '•• <br /> y r ..!'rt .-i Building 9 <br /> t t <br /> •1,► .e o <br /> Q !; •—.-�- ,Terrace t:�r lei -sr L„, 1 O <br /> J/ A ea . . i-y } ' <br /> II <br /> WILMS <br /> i� "s ', <br /> i i ., V i i <br /> �.{�te�r <br /> StC#tr.'sCluch ��, !"r' ' t.'y,} <br /> 1 <br /> . ,\,,,,.\\\,...\,..V.\.,-\., : <br /> 1 )) 5 <br /> 5 vALLEYt'A <br /> 40h. <br /> Additional detail on the proposed project is included in Attachment 5, the April 25, 2018 <br /> Planning Commission Agenda Report. <br /> APPEALS FILED <br /> Appeal by Darlene and Michael Miller <br /> On June 29, 2018, Darlene and Michael Miller ("the Millers") filed an appeal. Reasons <br /> for the Millers' appeal are summarized as follows: <br /> 1. Planning Commission's approval violated the conditions of approval originally <br /> placed on this site when it was constructed, in terms of outdoor activities/uses. <br /> 2. Noise impacts from the playground and from events were not properly analyzed, <br /> and the noise will be detrimental to neighbors. <br /> Page 6 of 15 <br />