25 - Laserfiche WebLink

reconfiguration of these site elements, or of the parking lot or proposed church buildings may be necessary. Condition No. 3 of the St. Clare's Conditional Use Permit requires Planning Commission design review of the Phase Il improvements, which would be an opportunity for adjustments in the building(s) and parking lot(s) location or configuration to be reviewed and approved. Provided that Chabad's uses and overall site plan remain generally consistent with the current proposal and that contemplated in the St. Clare's Master Plan, staff suggests these could be reviewed and approved at the staff level. St. Clare's has indicated that they do not expect to move forward with their expansion for at least five years, which will allow time for Chabad to operate within the parameters of their project as approved, before having to contemplate revisions to it. Trash Enclosure St. Clare's letter also pointed that the Chabad is currently using St. Clare's trash enclosure to house their refuse containers, and that new mandatory recycling requirements will likely mean that St. Clare's will need to use the entire enclosure to house their required trash and recycling bins. Staff recognizes this concern, and as such, has included a condition of approval that will require Chabad to construct its own trash enclosure, unless an agreement can be reached between the two parties to construct, use and maintain a shared enclosure. Chabad Revised Site Plan On February 11, 2019, Chabad submitted a revised site plan that includes a reconfigured and enlarged outdoor patio area to the west of the building; a contemplation garden; and series of storage sheds to be located within the buffer area to the north. This revised plan is included as Attachment 3. This plan differs considerably from the current application, which has been extensively analyzed and vetted through the staff, Planning Commission and public review process. Should the applicant wish to proceed with this revised plan, staff recommends that it be formally submitted as either a new or amended project application, which would allow for a detailed analysis in light of all of the considerations and required findings for approval, and for public review and comment. No other specific recommendation on the revised plan is being made to the City Council at this time. Note that, irrespective of the City Council's action on the two appeals (i.e. whether it resulted in approval or denial of the application), the applicant could submit a new or amended application. Page 12 of 14