Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 6: Proposed Fence along Sycamore Road <br /> a1.TSIE'L III- II I I / <br /> , I <br /> I! / <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • I <br /> i <br /> ir• <br /> \ <br /> III l I hl I f I II .1. l ■11 I III■ M l I I In <br /> • INSIDE ELEVATION <br /> g1436RADE GOM'AGTLD 4 7xb WOOD RAILS TTP. <br /> ro<is% <br /> • 7x6 Hoop GAP AI.I 'N Ep6E 51&ALJ."ti-PLD WII�hrSH 7 <br /> 7 � W/OU i41DC FACE Or POST <br /> ` GPLHI tv 1 '.5'A. <br /> TINCCN P05T5 <br /> I TYP t <br /> \ 4,6 <br /> 11001::,POST t.,),t.,), INHSTALL EESIDE TO RAILS,BOTTOM Gr-MESH TO <br /> k" I \SE GUT T•P. REST Tor-1H1sH r,RA <br /> I. MESH TO REMAIN TREE <br /> rrr. <br /> 1 60" HT. 4-RAIL WOOD FENCE <br /> W/ WIRE MESH <br /> Geotechnical Review <br /> While this is not a geologically sensitive area, a Geotechnical Report was provided by <br /> Henry Justiniano & Associates dated "Received August 2, 2018" that analyzes the <br /> property and provides a number of recommendations regarding site preparations, <br /> foundation design, and other pertinent solutions. Ultimately, the report notes the site is <br /> suitable for the proposed residence. The Geotechnical Report can be reviewed in further <br /> detail in Exhibit C. <br /> PROJECT SITE ALTERNATIVES <br /> The subject parcel is a legally created lot zoned for residential uses. The proposed home <br /> meets the intent of the underlying zoning designation. Alternatives include: <br /> 1 . A one-story residence; <br /> 2. A two-story residence with modified roof forms that reduce the overall height and <br /> mass of the proposed home; <br /> 3. No project, under which the site would not be developed in the near-term. <br /> While Alternatives 1 and 2 would result in a residence with reduced height and mass, the <br /> Specific Plan allows two-story residences and, as this is a PUD development plan, the <br /> height can be permitted as proposed. Moreover, the proposed residence's large <br /> setbacks, extensive landscaping, and articulated building design help mitigate the <br /> building height and mass. Alternative 3 is inconsistent with the purpose of the lot which <br /> was created for residential purposes and permitting a house on the subject lot is <br /> consistent with the Specific Plan. The proposed project represents a reasonable <br /> PUD-131, 481 Sycamore Rd. Planning Commission <br /> 9 of 11 <br />