Laserfiche WebLink
options. Staff will recommend an urgency ordinance to go into effect immediately which <br /> requires a 4/5 vote. If there is not a 4/5 vote, they will propose a regular ordinance which takes <br /> a second reading and would go to the Council with noticing for March 19 and would be <br /> effective 30 days thereafter; however, this brings them to April 19 which just misses the <br /> deadlines for having aesthetic regulations in place. <br /> Commissioner Balch said he has noticed there are many AT&T and Verizon sites that have <br /> been agendized for staff level approval and he asked if those were small cell facilities. <br /> Mr. Beaudin confirmed they were not technically small cell as being discussed today, but some <br /> are considered micro-cell. These are seen on Zoning Administrator Action Reports for design <br /> review applications. Some of them end up going through the building permit process, some get <br /> built, some do not and many are modifications to existing cell sites. <br /> Commissioner Ritter asked if the updated ordinance will make the process more streamlined <br /> and less subjective. <br /> Mr. Beaudin confirmed the policy is to create objective standards which will then allow staff to <br /> process within the shot clock time allowed for the small cell sites. <br /> Commissioner Ritter asked if staff wished to modify any of the recommendations, given the <br /> presentation, questions and comments prior to the Commission's recommendation to the City <br /> Council. <br /> Mr. Beaudin said Mr. May raised the concern around bonding and he also thought there was <br /> some question around the 750 feet which Commissioner Brown raised. <br /> Commissioner Brown said he also thinks the Commission should consider the consumer <br /> aspect because it sounds as if there is a legitimate technical concern. <br /> Mr. May referred to concealment and the situation where the applicant might come in with a <br /> 5G antenna that could not be shrouded but were able to put some shrouding around the <br /> non-antenna parts of it and cover it with film. This is what has been seen and considered as <br /> concealment and they seek to have the design of it blend in better with the background. <br /> Commissioner Brown said he understands the design intent to disguise them as much as <br /> possible, but he thinks within the policy should have greater degrees of freedom to do that. <br /> Commissioner Balch asked and confirmed that staff was seeking adoption of the policy and <br /> ordinance as drafted and thinks the bonding element was essential as well as the 750 feet of <br /> distance. Mr. Beaudin agreed, and reaffirmed the Commission was also being asked to include <br /> the modifications contained in the memo on the dais. <br /> Commissioner Brown said what concerns him with the 750 feet is that the whole point of 5G is <br /> high speed low to the ground, close to the user of the wireless end point, and he questioned <br /> how this would be accomplished at 750 feet. It is more about data propagation and the ability <br /> to deliver a quality of service that meets the standard. Therefore, he supports the policy but <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 9 of 12 February 20, 2019 <br />ith two <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 12 February 20, 2019 <br />ary 20, 2019 <br />is. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 12 February 20, 2019 <br />missioners to describe what parts of the review process have <br /> worked well. <br /> Commissioner Balch stated that staff has done a great job asking applicants to bring their <br /> project to the Planning Commission as a workshop before they invest heavily in a design. He <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 5 January 23, 2019 <br />