Laserfiche WebLink
a. Tract 8483, Frank Berlogar <br />Application for a Vesting Tentative Map to subdivide an approximately 15.81 -acre site at <br />88 Silver Oaks Terrace into two lots measuring approximately 4.46 acres and <br />11.35 acres. Zoning for the property is PUD-HR/OS (Planned Unit Development — <br />Hillside Residential/Open Space) District. <br />Commissioner Ritter moved to approve the Consent Calendar. <br />Commissioner Balch seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Allen, Balch, Brown, Ritter <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Commissioner O'Connor <br />Resolution PC -2019-01 approving Vesting Tentative Map 8483 was entered and adopted as <br />motioned. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARING AND OTHER MATTERS <br />a. P19-0027, City of Pleasanton <br />City -initiated application to consider and make recommendations regarding: <br />amending Chapter 18.110 (Personal Wireless Service Facilities) of the Pleasanton <br />Municipal Code to add a new section 18.110.010.B., Special Provisions for Small <br />Wireless Facilities, and making them subject to a permit as specified in a new City <br />Council Policy; and (2) adoption of a citywide City Council Policy; Small Wireless <br />Facilities, regulating the permitting, design, and location of such facilities. <br />Outside Legal Counsel Tripp May with Telecom Law Firm presented the agenda report. <br />Commissioner Balch referred to No.2 of the FCC requirements that regulations be "no more <br />burdensome" and asked if this would apply to multiple applicants wherein at some point there <br />might not be enough room on the antenna and asked if the second applicant then becomes <br />more burdened by a restriction on size. <br />Mr. May said he did not believe the carrier would be able to complain against the City for <br />approving another applicant's site in a location they wanted, as long as the other carrier came <br />first and there was a reasonable process. <br />Assistant City Attorney Julie Harryman asked if Mr. May has seen carriers co -locating. Mr. May <br />presented a picture of what co -location looks like and said it is technically feasible but not <br />always practical given structural and electrical issues and space available. <br />Commissioner Balch posed a scenario wherein there was a 50 -foot pole in a public <br />right-of-way in an area where the City has a height restriction for structures. He asked if this <br />would be an issue. <br />Mr. May said this is a technical feasibility question and said the height restriction may be <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 12 February 20, 2019 <br />