My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
031919
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2019 3:26:54 PM
Creation date
3/14/2019 3:26:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/19/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Director Beaudin clarified that fixed bus routes are different from rail routes as they can be moved <br /> or eliminated for RHNA purposes, in response to Councilmember Brown's inquiry. <br /> Councilmember Testa noted she recently attended a conference with colleagues who are <br /> providing affordable housing and serving the homeless population in the Bay area who are not in <br /> support of these bills. They feel they are real estate bills and do not address affordable housing. <br /> She noted that 20% of housing projects in Pleasanton have an affordability component and many <br /> of these bills do not support that. The majority of the housing that will be produced as a result of <br /> these bills are high market rate housing. Councilmember Testa wants the City work on mitigating <br /> the RHNA impacts and support the competing bills in a way that will allow the City to support a <br /> model that will work towards housing goals without the significant impacts that CASA and SB 50 <br /> would bring. <br /> Director Beaudin clarified if there was a development agreement in place the City would lock in <br /> the timeline and use growth management to make sure it would be counted towards RHNA, in <br /> response to Councilmember Narum's inquiry. <br /> Mayor Thorne opened the item for public comments. Seeing no speakers, Mayor Thorne closed <br /> the item for public comment. <br /> City Manager Fialho stated the City has approved some projects without development <br /> agreements and growth management and suggests doing both moving forward. <br /> Councilmember Brown commented that Pleasanton is more than a bedroom community and it <br /> sounds like the State, in their allocation of RHNA, are trying to characterize Pleasanton as a <br /> bedroom community. The City lost a business that had jobs when it was scraped, and Summer <br /> Hill was put in on Los Positas. She also noted that Pleasanton has more jobs than housing and it <br /> is easy for people to commute to Pleasanton. She hopes there is some logic to job centers on the <br /> very edge of Alameda County were people can commute to work and do their jobs in a timely <br /> manner. <br /> Councilmember Testa stated the increase in businesses will only penalize Pleasanton in RHNA. <br /> Mayor Thorne noted he has been at the BART station in the morning and sees that the trains are <br /> not empty coming to Pleasanton, however, the trains are beyond capacity to the Bay Area. <br /> Councilmember Narum expressed support the City is on the right track to find the right ways to <br /> protect local control. Councilmember Testa stated the City needs to support SB 4 which is a <br /> competing bill to this legislation and is supported by many homeless advocates. <br /> MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCIL <br /> Councilmember Testa reported that a few members of the Committee for Energy and Environment <br /> have expressed concern about being a temporary committee and inquired if the Committee status can <br /> be placed on a future agenda for City Council consideration. <br /> City Manager Fialho reported the standing of the committee is set by a City Council resolution which is <br /> periodically updated. That effort is determined by the City Council. Mayor Thorne stated the priority <br /> setting process is turning into a massive project and any staff time dedicated over the next two years <br /> needs to be looked at in the bigger picture. He feels that this item can be discussed at the March 12 <br /> meeting. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 8 of 9 February 19, 2019 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.