Laserfiche WebLink
the CDBG allocation is significantly less (or more) than anticipated. [The same will <br />be done with the HC regarding the HOME allocation-] <br />Status of Pre -Existing Allocations <br />Attachment 4 provides a history of funding through the CDBG program including the <br />allocation of LIHF funds for the past three fiscal years (2016 through 2019)_ With regard <br />to FY 2018/19 funding, staff is generally satisfied that most projects are progressing <br />satisfactorily at mid -year. Staff anticipates that all grant recipients will expend all of their <br />grant amounts by the end of the current fiscal year. <br />Human Services Commission Meeting Process <br />At the February meeting, it was agreed that the March 6 meeting would begin early at 6 <br />p.m. Similarly, the commission decided not to require mandatory presentations from <br />each agency. All agencies can attend the public meeting and will have an opportunity <br />to speak if desired (and to answer questions by the commission if applicable). The <br />commission has specifically requested brief presentations at the beginning of the <br />meeting from agencies listed below: <br />6:05 p.m. <br />Child Care Links <br />Behavioral Health Care Services <br />6:15 p.m. <br />CityServe of the Th -Valley <br />CDBG Grant for Facility Build Out <br />6-25 p.m. <br />CityServe of the Tri -Valley <br />Crisis Intervention -Sheltered Residents <br />6-35 p.m. <br />NAMI Tri -Valley <br />Pleasanton Housing and Human Services Grant Application <br />6:45 p.m. <br />Tri -Valley Haven <br />Capital Improvement Project (Facilities Rehab. Project) <br />CONCLUSION <br />As in prior years, the commission is faced with limited funds relative to the aggregate <br />dollar amount requested. The funding allocation structure of the HHSG program <br />improves the funding picture somewhat, both in terms of aggregate funding available <br />and the potential for greater efficiency in allocating funds. However, potential cuts to <br />federal programs in the short-term future create the possibility of fewer federal dollars to <br />allocate locally. The City has dedicated General Funds (increasing 4.61% from last <br />year) to supplement federal funds and ensure that local critical human service needs <br />are provided to the community. <br />The task before the commission is to review the non -housing applications and consider <br />funding recommendations for City Council approval, Staff recommends that the <br />commission develop a funding recommendation for City Council based on staff's <br />proposed funding allocations (shown in Attachment 1) which includes the following <br />considerations: <br />• Individual commissioner evaluation of projects (e.g. based on the scoring tools <br />used in ZoomGrants incorporating the established HHSG project review criteria) <br />