Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. PC-2019-05 <br /> Page Two <br /> 1. Whether the proposed development plan is in the best interest of the public <br /> health, safety, and general welfare. <br /> The Planning Commission finds that the proposed project, as conditioned, meets all <br /> applicable City standards concerning public health, safety, and welfare. The project <br /> will not generate volumes of traffic that cannot be accommodated by existing City <br /> streets and intersections in the area. The proposed residence will be designed to <br /> meet the requirements of the California Building Code, California Fire Code, and <br /> other applicable codes. As such, the Commission concludes this finding can be <br /> made. <br /> 2. Whether the proposed development plan is consistent with the Pleasanton <br /> General Plan and any applicable specific plan. <br /> The proposed development includes the construction of one new home and the <br /> retention of one existing home on an approximately 1.33-acre lot. The Planning <br /> Commission finds the proposed density conforms to the General Plan Low Density <br /> Residential land use designation with a maximum of two dwelling units per gross <br /> developable acre. The proposed project promotes General Plan Programs and <br /> Policies encouraging new housing to be developed on infill sites and encouraging <br /> the preservation of the existing housing stock. <br /> In addition to the General Plan, the proposed project is consistent with the intent of <br /> the North Sycamore Specific plan (NSSP). There is no Planned Unit Development <br /> plan for the subject lot, but the NSSP details general guidelines that the subject lot <br /> should follow. The proposal is consistent with the guidelines including setbacks, <br /> density, landscaping, and character of the subject lot. <br /> The NSSP notes development should correspond generally to the Agricultural (A) <br /> district. While deviating slightly in terms of height and fence style, the Commission <br /> finds the intent of the Specific Plan is still met. The proposed height of the residence <br /> is approximately 31-feet 3-inches which is slightly taller than the 30-feet in the <br /> A-district requirements. However, given its large proposed setbacks, extensive <br /> landscaping, and proposed building design the additional height is largely mitigated <br /> and the scale meets the intent of the A-district. Additionally, the proposed fencing <br /> along Sycamore is 1-foot taller than the guidelines call for (5-feet instead of 4-feet). <br /> This is largely due to Building Codes and the requirement for additional fencing <br /> around the pool that may conflict with large oak trees on the property if the 4-foot <br /> height is maintained. The fence style and design meets the intent of the guidelines <br /> and would not conflict with the neighborhood. As such, the Commission concludes <br /> that this finding can be made. <br />0 sq.ft. of garage). The proposed residence is 5,059 sq. ft. and <br /> the proposed garage is 939 sq.ft.. <br /> Measured from the average elevation of the natural grade of the ground covered by the structure to the mean height <br /> between the eaves and ridges, as defined by the PMC. <br /> PUD-131, 481 Sycamore Rd. Planning Commission <br /> 4 of 11 <br />8-0269, 1131 Sleepy Head Lane Planning Commission <br /> Page 7 of 8 <br />