My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
031119
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2019 4:06:34 PM
Creation date
3/6/2019 4:06:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/11/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
requirements for all facilities are evenly applied, and also ensure that all facilities <br /> meet minimum standards in the event that an approval is mandated by law. <br /> 7. Three Issues Raised by the Planning Commission <br /> First, in accordance with the motion made by the Commission, staff has removed <br /> the requirement that applicants post a performance bond to ensure removal of <br /> the equipment upon the end of the license period (as the City may not impose <br /> more burdensome requirements on wireless facilities and other utility companies <br /> are not required to post removal bonds.) Second, as requested by the <br /> Commission, staff and legal counsel reviewed the requirements related to <br /> concealment and the maximum height of antennas to balance the need to <br /> maintain community aesthetics with the reasonably foreseeable standards of new <br /> technologies. As a result, staff modified the policy to allow the Community <br /> Development Director to have the authority to approve alternative concealment <br /> techniques if those stated in the Policy become technically infeasible. Staff also <br /> provided flexibility to the Policy to allow five feet (instead of four feet) above the <br /> existing support structure to allow for the possibility for less bulky and more <br /> vertical design. Third, based on input from the Commission as well as from <br /> industry stakeholders (AT&T and Verizon), staff has modified the requirement <br /> that the applicant demonstrate that the project is in the more preferred location <br /> within 350 feet (instead of 750 feet) of the proposed site if the applicant can <br /> demonstrate with clear and convincing evidence that the more preferred location <br /> is technically infeasible. <br /> 8. Discussions with Industry Stakeholders <br /> Staff received letters from AT&T and Verizon (along with inquiries from other <br /> industry stakeholders) prior to the February 20th meeting of the Planning <br /> Commission. (Those letters are attached.) Following the Commission's meeting, <br /> staff and/or outside legal counsel conferred with both AT&T and Verizon to <br /> discuss areas of concern. AT&T requested that wireless facilities be approvable <br /> through a preapproved design process. Staff believes that having pre-approved <br /> designs would expedite the process while also guaranteeing that the City gets <br /> the best design possible. Accordingly, the Policy has been modified with the <br /> addition of section 2.8, Preapproved Designs. Industry stakeholders also asked <br /> that the City consider reducing the radius of the required site survey that the <br /> carrier is required to submit as part of the application. Staff recommends that the <br /> site survey (identifying all existing boundaries, encroachments, structures, <br /> utilities, etc. be set at a radius of 300 feet in order to match the noticing <br /> provisions. Next, staff considered a request to relax the restrictions on all <br /> ground-mounted equipment. Staff modified only the language regarding electric <br /> meters to state that the Community Development Director shall not approve a <br /> separate ground-mounted electric meter pedestal unless all other options are <br /> technically infeasible and the proposed pedestal will be located off any sidewalk <br /> areas. Finally, industry stakeholders asked that the City relax the currently <br /> proposed restrictions on traffic signals, new wood poles and decorative poles or <br /> allow for the use of pre-approved designs. Staff believes that the most prudent <br /> Page 5of7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.