Laserfiche WebLink
BACKGROUND <br /> On September 26, 2018, the FCC adopted new rules that further limit local authority to <br /> regulate "small wireless facilities" as that term is defined in 47 C.F.R. § 1.6002(1). The <br /> FCC rules, which became effective on January 14, 2019, would require the City to <br /> review small cell applications faster and consistent with the FCC's national standard for <br /> permissible local regulations. These rules are part of a larger rulemaking that aims to <br /> reinterpret the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and prohibit actual and effective <br /> local moratoria on infrastructure deployments. <br /> Small wireless facilities generally include the smaller scale antennas and associated <br /> facilities (as compared to first generation macro facilities) that are part of the next <br /> generation of wireless technology, known as 5G. 5G operates at significantly faster <br /> speeds than the existing 4th Generation (4G) technology, using higher frequency, <br /> directional radio waves over shorter distances. 5G technology calls for smaller, more <br /> frequently-placed antennas than 4G, which lend themselves to placement on light-poles <br /> and similar existing infrastructure. Wireless carriers have begun 5G installation in a <br /> number of major cities areas across the country, including Sacramento and Los <br /> Angeles, and are working towards nationwide deployment by the end of 2020. <br /> Attachment 4 is a "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQ) document that staff has <br /> developed to provide additional information on small wireless facilities, and the scope of <br /> current Federal and City regulations. <br /> Under the new rules, the FCC defines the presumptively reasonable time for review as <br /> 60 days for small cell attachments to existing structures and 90 days for attachments to <br /> new structures. Any administrative appeal must also occur within the applicable review <br /> times or "shot clock". If the City fails to issue a timely final decision, the City's failure to <br /> act presumptively constitutes an effective prohibition of service and the applicant may <br /> file a claim in federal court for an injunction to issue "shovel-ready" permits. <br /> In addition, the FCC provides that a local small cell regulation causes an effective <br /> prohibition in violation of federal law unless the regulation is 1) reasonable; 2) no more <br /> burdensome than regulations imposed on similar infrastructure deployments; and 3) <br /> objective and published in advance. Reasonable regulations are those that are <br /> technically feasible and reasonably directed to avoiding or remedying the "intangible <br /> public harm" (as it is described by the FCC) of unsightly or out-of-character <br /> deployments. Although the FCC declared that minimum spacing or undergrounding <br /> requirements would potentially violate the new test, the FCC provided little guidance as <br /> to the scope of specific local regulations that would likely be considered to be <br /> preempted. The regulations mean that the City may not prohibit placement of small <br /> cells within the public right-of-way or on publicly-owned and operated utility poles but <br /> can prescribe reasonable standards for their placement and design. <br /> On December 10, 2018, the FCC clarified the effective dates for the rule, stating that the <br /> shot clock and fee regulations go into effect on January 14, 2019, and the aesthetic <br /> regulations go into effect on April 15, 2019. In order to meet the April 15 deadline <br /> regarding aesthetic regulations, staff recommends that the Council adopt the code <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br />