Laserfiche WebLink
• Produce 35,000 housing units per year - 14,000 affordable to low-income and <br /> 7,000 to moderate-income, a 60% affordability rate; <br /> • Preserve 30,000 existing affordable units - 26,000 of which are market-rate <br /> affordable units and 4,000 that are at-risk over the next 5 years; and <br /> • Protect 300,000 lower-income households - those who spend more than 50% of <br /> income on their housing). <br /> To achieve these goals, the Compact includes 10 Elements (or actions). Below is a brief <br /> summary (see Attachment 2 of the Tri-Valley Cities Housing Policy and Framework, <br /> which is Attachment 1, for a more detailed overview): <br /> Elements 1-3 — Preserve and Protect <br /> Together, these elements represent the "preserve and protect" components of <br /> the Compact, including arguments for: just-cause eviction standards; rent caps; <br /> rent assistance; and free legal counsel. <br /> Elements 4-8— Production <br /> Together, these elements are the "production" component of the Compact, with <br /> subcategories, including: accessory dwelling units (ADUs); process streamlining <br /> and financial incentives; and using public land for affordable housing. <br /> Elements 9-10— Revenue and Administration <br /> Together, these elements offer revenue generating mechanisms to fund the <br /> Compact and suggests the formation of a new independent regional "housing <br /> authority" to collect and distribute those funds. <br /> The Compact concludes with "Calls for Action," which were ideas that garnered <br /> sufficient interest from the CASA steering committee, but not enough to become a <br /> stand-alone element in the Compact. A brief discussion of these can also be found in <br /> Attachment 1. <br /> Tri-Valley Cities Response to the CASA Compact <br /> The Housing and Policy Framework includes, as Attachment 1, a response to each of <br /> the 10 Compact Elements, including: <br /> • Concerns and Considerations, including a "Concern Status" of Low, Medium or <br /> High, based on an initial assessment of the degree of impact the particular policy <br /> approach is likely to have on Tri-Valley Cities; and/or conflict with positions <br /> outlined in the Key Themes; and a synopsis of key concerns. <br /> • Recommended Approach, which reflect the Tri-Valley Cities' recommended <br /> advocacy position on the element, ranging (in order of most to least degree of <br /> support): Support/Expand, Support with Amendments, Oppose unless Amended, <br /> and Oppose. Several of the policies are noted as "Monitor" where there is known <br /> Page 5 of 9 <br />